678
'Confused' Judge Cannon needed concept explained 'slowly' to her in court by lawyers: NYT
(www.rawstory.com)
this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
678 points (98.3% liked)
politics
19138 readers
3739 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yet they seem to dominate when sparring with the left.
If you think spewing mostly fabricated, irrelevant nonsense is dominating, then yes. They absolutely dominate.
Edit: ooof, that post history
I think there is more going on then that. Wouldn't you?
If I go ask ten people what they think about any wedge issue, majority of them will give right wing talking points even if they don't lean right.
They're winning and being ignorant to it doesn't help any. I still see assholes on my overpass on weekends rotating topics like carbon taxes, vaccines, bill gates, WHO and so on. The supporting honks they get is soul crushing.
Can you explain what spewing mostly fabricated, irrelevant nonsense has to do with being dominate socially or politically? Cause I would argue it's more of an obstacle to dominating in these areas.
Yes, you are correct — their rhetoric is more further-reaching, no doubt. They control the narratives, absolutely. But this isn't because they're being rhetoricians, it's because:
And where is the morality in letting a political party without morals gain power. When was the last time that Clark Kent was a relevant archetype. The antihero is king now. But also is it real morals when there isn't really any rules beyond social norms. All of them are corrupt regardless. I wouldn't call some of the Democrats moral actors. They just attempt to act more as adults.
They have the vast majority of the money and with it a greater loudspeaker.
But the left also has money but why has the right used it to secure so many public areas. Like all their civil actions had so much funding. I remember individuals donating millions to the clownvoy. Charlie Kirk is successful becoming a millionaire as a college drop out who opened a political shit throwing business and introducing youth on campuses around the country to people like Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson. What was the left doing?
Selling fear and rage porn and lies and half-truths will always be easier than conveying the complexity and nuance of truth and reality.
Sure, but again who gives two shits about truths and reality. We all went nuts for Plato's allegory of the cave for a few months a while ago for a reason. Truths don't matter, but truth does. The Republicans win because they understand this. And as I get older I think this idea that the left hobbles themselves because they're focused on being moral and truth seekers is more of an excuse for not being as effective as they should be.
You hang out with stupid people. You have confused your friends with a random sample of the population.
Don't be rude. Acting as if you're more enlightened can be a defense mechanism. People aren't stupid because they lean right on issues. Most people on the right are business owners and have figured enough out in life to become fairly successful.
Reread what you're implying vs who I said I would ask and think about who is confused about a random sample. It seems you are under the impression I'm asking people I hang out with when that was never said.
Arguing with a conservative is like playing chess with a pigeon. The problem is that onlookers think the pigeon won after it shits all over the board.
The problem also is it's up to the onlookers to decide who "won".
I disagree. Its so much bigger than arguing with randoms online. Its about average opinion of average people.
I hope you aren't talking about people using gish gallop.
That's all they've got.
I'm sorry, who's the current president again?
Yup and how much was the electoral process and democracy damaged?
We're debating right now what happens if a president is in prison.
Joe Biden won. But how confident are you that he's holding for the next ten years? Plus who owns the courts right now for the next couple decades. Ground is lost everyday. Just wait for an economic downturn.
I know it's a very difficult concept for trumpists to grasp, but some people respect term limits, so Biden doesn't actually hold out for the next 10 years.
Democrats hold on and don't shit the bed.
Correct, Diaper Donny does shit the bed on the regular though.
sure, diaper Donny is an absolute turd. But a turd who somehow has built a base that has more energy and commitment than anything in any other political group. They stormed the capital when he lost. They have hobbled elections and democracy for at least the next couple elections. And that's only because Donny is such an idiot. You're looking at this the wrong way. Donny as you would say is an absolute moron and shits the bed. But the left still lost and is only going to win the next election because Biden has been ok as a president. If Trump wasn't an idiot, America could be in a much different place right now. And really, it kind of is in a much different place since the democrats lost the courts for a possible a couple decades.
I'm not sure why you got downvoted for this, so I upvoted it.
The Democrats are having a hell of a time making things work out for them. Every election they have, they are at BEST tied and frequently have times where they are under water on polling. The average person has no idea what the Dems have done for him, and only sees 'muh gas cost more, muh groceries cost more, and it's all Biden's fault.'
Biden's numbers go up when he Dark Brandons, but they don't stay that way because the Right's bullshit is non-stop and never-ending. You get force-fed it by supposedly 'left'-leaning organisations like CNN and MSNBC. The only voices those media outlets let speak are the ones hand-wringing about the latest thing Dems got wrong, and of course constant non-stop coverage of the worst aspects of the protests on the Left. And then Biden goes back to being quiet. We voters on the left are basically treated like mushrooms, 'fed shit and kept in the dark.' Moderates start buying the rhetoric that inflation is Biden's fault and Biden's responsibility to fix, despite the fact that profits are at an all-time high.
I'd be careful about calling Trump an idiot. You don't get where he has gotten while being an idiot. Let's not attribute to incompetence what SHOULD be attributed to malice. Trump failed to get where he wanted to be because he underestimated the bureaucracy. He's not planning on doing that this time, nor are his backers, and the Project to Dismantle American Democracy (euphemistically called Project 2025) details EXACTLY how he intends to do it.
Trump's shitting the bed is intentional, because he knows that he could broadcast a live TV video feed during prime time of him in bed, with a live boy, a dead girl, a half-eaten puppy, and a half-eaten kitten, and then take a massive shit right in the middle of that bed, and 30% of Americans would vote for him with no reservations, and another 15-20% would vote for him 'because he's our guy who shits the bed and not the other guy or gal.' As he famously said, he could shoot somebody on 5th Avenue and those 30% would STILL vote for him. America has a taste for authoritarianism (as it always has, REALLY, some people need to study history), and Trump has leveraged that for political gain.
We need to stop underestimating Trump's ability and intelligence, and by 'we', I mean the Democratic Party leadership, starting all the way at the top with President Biden. It's time for Dark Brandon to come out and not go back home until after Election Day, and for heavens sake, keep trotting him out the next four years.
PS: Let's either swap Harris out, or make her start being the face of this Admin. Biden can't run in 2028, and if Trump Sr. isn't there to capitalise on this, Trump Jr. or some other authoritarian jerk will be, as will Project 202~~5~~9.
Thank you for understanding. I feel like I'm going insane seeing this and doesn't seem others are grasping this stuff. Sadly I don't think trump is dump either but I feel like it has to be said here just so I don't have to also go into explaining that. The right is smart where the left is not. The right wing seems to grasp social game more. Trump knows how to make politics entertaining to average guys
What
"Biden is so bad that Trump might actually get elected" is not the defence of Republicans that you think it is.