you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 438 points 2 years ago (30 children)

Really, the disqualification is probably better publicity than winning the award itself. If someone told me some vegan cheese won a "Good Food" award, I would assume it was related to eco- and social-consciousness. Learning that it was so delicious that the dairy industry schemed to take away the award tells me they're afraid of the competition.

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 207 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    When Seiko beat the Swiss at their own mechanical watch accuracy competitions, they decided to cancel the long running prestigious competition entirely instead of make a better watch.

    Capitalism breeds innovation!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Same with Japanese Scotch whiskeys absolutely running the table on ones from Scotland in competitions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    That's partly because "Scotch" is a protected label. You can only call a Whisky Scotch if it was distilled with a certain technique, from certain grains, by certain companies, and matured in certain casks for a certain amount of time. All of it is regulated.

    Japanese whisky doesn't have these limitations. They can just do whatever makes it taste good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Scotch whisky must be made in Scotland. Similar story with bourbon, bourbon must be made in the United States. In many places you can follow the same recipes and processes as those products, but you may not label them with those terms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yes, but being made in Scotland isn't enough to call your whisky Scotch. There's a whole rulebook.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    You can make whiskey, though. According to the EU, if you have a product distilled from grain mash and stored, at full undiluted strength, in wood casks for at least three years, you can call it whiskey. You can produce a Single Malt Whiskey, or a Rye Whiskey, anywhere you want and in fact some German Korn would qualify as whiskey as it's aged long enough.

    Side note: Whisky wasn't always aged. Originally it pretty much resembled Korn (though German noses have some rather strict standards when it comes to fusel alcohols that Whisky and Vodka producers don't tend to have), then the UK prohibition came along and distillers had no choice but to let the stuff age in its casks while they fought the legislation, then they were allowed to sell the aged stuff, aged much longer than was previously common, and the rest is history.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

    To be fair, a crystal clock is just going to be more accurate than a movement based watch. Even the biggest watch fanboys admit that a $30 Seiko Casio outperforms the majority of mechanicals on raw accuracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    So... The existing market leader chose to flip the table instead of admitting that their position was weaker and lower value.

    Yep, that sure sounds like the pursuit of capital instead of... innovation, quality, or any of the other attributes capitalism attempts to associate itself with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    The Neuchâtel Observatory is a publicly funded institution that certifies movements with high accuracy as chronometers. Not a private body, or a marketing tool used by a watchmaker. The same ‘competition’ is done by other observatories, all giving their own rating of a timepiece’s accuracy against a reference chronometer kept at the observatory.

    A quick search could have brought you that information_ Quartz movements beat the pants off mechanical movements, and they’re far cheaper to make, allowing the non-rich to have a decent watch with good battery life and serious accuracy. Cheap and normal mechanical watches regularly drift and lose a few seconds time over days and weeks - quartz drifts between 1-110 seconds over a year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    So funnily enough, the very first movement they submitted to the contest in 1963 was a quartz, and it placed tenth overall. They went with mechanical movements for subsequent competitions, and didn’t actually start placing high again until 1966 when they placed ninth overall. In ‘67 they did even better, placing fourth, but then the contest was canceled for good the next year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I could have never known this award even existed if not for this news. I don't care at all for cheese and now I'm curious to try it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    You're right, but it's understandable why the dairy industry shat themselves. They fucked up by allowing things to be named "oat milk" or "whatever milk", so they damn sure aren't going to let their "cheese" territory get encroached on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The problem with restricting the use of the term "milk" is that people have been using the term "milk" to describe non-dairy liquids for longer than there have been trademarks. The word hasn't ever been used exclusively to describe dairy.

    Here's a dictionary entry for "milk" from 1755:

    https://johnsonsdictionaryonline.com/1755/milk_ns

    Note that it includes almond and pistachio milks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments