this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
97 points (100.0% liked)

neurodiverse

1665 readers
1 users here now

What is Neurodivergence?

It's ADHD, Autism, OCD, schizophrenia, anxiety, depression, bi-polar, aspd, etc etc etc etc

“neurologically atypical patterns of thought or behavior”

So, it’s very broad, if you feel like it describes you then it does as far as we're concerned


Rules

1.) ableist language=post or comment will probably get removed (enforced case by case, some comments will be removed and restored due to complex situations). repeated use of ableist language=banned from comm and possibly site depending on severity. properly tagged posts with CW can use them for the purposes of discussing them

2.) always assume good faith when dealing with a fellow nd comrade especially due to lack of social awareness being a common symptom of neurodivergence

2.5) right to disengage is rigidly enforced. violations will get you purged from the comm. see rule 3 for explanation on appeals

3.) no talking over nd comrades about things you haven't personally experienced as a neurotypical chapo, you will be purged. If you're ND it is absolutely fine to give your own perspective if it conflicts with another's, but do so with empathy and the intention to learn about each other, not prove who's experience is valid. Appeal process is like appealing in user union but you dm the nd comrade you talked over with your appeal (so make it a good one) and then dm the mods with screenshot proof that you resolved it. fake screenies will get you banned from the site, we will confirm with the comrade you dm'd.

3.5) everyone has their own lived experiences, and to invalidate them is to post cringe. comments will be removed on a case by case basis depending on determined level of awareness and faith

4.) Interest Policing will not be tolerated in any form. Support your comrades in their joy!

Further rules to be added/ rules to be changed based on community input

RULES NOTE: For this community more than most we understand that the clarity and understandability of these rules is very important for allowing folks to feel comfortable, to that end please don't be afraid to be outspoken about amendments and addendums to these rules, as well as any we may have missed

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I notice a lot of people use terms like "psychotic" or "psychopath" as insults and negative descriptions on here. These are clinical terms that are used to describe real people with difficulties, not boogeymen! I don't disagree with the sentiment that these people are doing wrong, but if you wouldn't use the r-slur or "autistic" as an insult (which you shouldn't) then you shouldn't use these words either. And I get the idea of calling someone delusional, but take care that you don't just mean "I disagree with them." Though by posting on neurodiverse I imagine I'm preaching to the choir.

Sincerely, a casual schizoaffective disorder haver.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (4 children)

yeah we need to do better on that. brainstorming alternate words might help. I've taken to calling people dipshits but that doesn't really work for this sort of unhinged, vile behavior.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Vicious, monstrous, sadistic, depraved, detestable or reprehensible (especially morally)

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Depraved I think is an especially good one! It has that venom without (as far as I know) being unintentionally hateful.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This thread makes me think that maybe we could brainstorm a post which has common ableist terms to provide suggestions for alternatives to drive a bit of gentle culture change.

I use words like ridiculous, laughable, senseless, absurd, and wild (e.g. wild idea/let's not get wild) a lot in the place of crazy. I could do better but I'm reasonably good on it.

I need to do better on terms like stupid and dumb. I know on the slur scale they're very mild but that's not a good excuse.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

This sounds like a great idea! I don't know a lot of slurs, but I know the ones that bother me. (Most of them were in the post already) But we could invite others to share ones that bother them and we can hopefully achieve this!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

we've tried a few times but it's basically impossible to find drop-in 1:1 replacements that are concise and evocative. Scatalogical is usually safest but even something like shithead is ableism if we're strict about it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

"Despicable" is my go-to.

(Also, greetings fellow Cupcake).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Am I wrong for thinking psychopathy should be treated ~~just as bad~~ in the same way as sadism?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So as I understand it, psychopathy is a disorder that incorporates low empathy and antisocial behaviors. A psychopath need not be a mass murderer and can, in fact, be indistinguishable from any other person on the street. The connotation of being a harmful, violent person is not necessarily the reality. My stance is "Any person is capable of any thing."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Some would argue that being indifferent to others’ suffering is ~~just as bad as~~ equal to taking pleasure in it. If we’re going to treat the word psychopath as derogatory, you could say the same about sadist.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure "sadist" isn't used to demonize and stigmatize neurodivergent people the way "psychopath" is (at least, I haven't personally come across it in that context but if someone else has pls lmk.) Therein lies the difference imo. Low empathy is not an inherently "evil" trait btw, it is a very common trait among neurodivergent people in fact. Painting people with low empathy as bad people because of their low empathy is ableist.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Quick internet search later: it seems "sadistic personality disorder" is an unofficial personality disorder that some people subscribe to. Hmm. That's definitely one ableist context for the word, so I'm wrong there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So part of being inclusive towards all sorts of neurodivergent people is embracing, encouraging, and accommodating their differences, right? Are we supposed to to treat people who take pleasure in making others suffer the same way?

You were right about “psychopath” before, I’m kind of wondering how we should treat sadism then.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

you lose a lot of consideration when your divergence puts others at risk. Maybe some non-fetish sadists need something like that dementia village.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Right. I think the difference there is that a psychopath typically has a physical difference in their brain that limits their empathy ability. Now you can also say a sadist is born with the desire and they can't really control it, so I'm not sure where the answer lies there. I typically don't use sadist as an insult (or at all, really) but I can see the arguments.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Is being a sadist and being a sadist as kink categorically different? Its just a responsiblity/ consent thing, like you can be a totally healthy person who is a sadist, right? I'm phrasing this poorly, but equating it with psychopathy on a mental health level seems wrong to me, not that either one should imply "bad person", is there anyone who could educate me on this?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m no expert but I do think there is a difference between sexual sadism and general sadism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

i have flirted with sadism when i was younger. like i would really, really be compelled to hurt things when extremely stressed and almost harmed some pets before. luckily i was able to stop myself but the compulsion was incredibly strong and part of me wanted to just get relief

also have some sexual sadism used kink as a safe sane consensual outlet for it. it's only fun with people that enjoy it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Yes, psychopathy isn't really a thing, the actual diagnosis that coincides with what previously was psychopathy is antisocial personality disorder. Much like all the other cluster B personality disorders, ASPD is often misunderstood, and media portrayals (as well as the popular imagination) get them completely wrong.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Bloodthirsty warmongers" might work here and there? (Thinkin about alternative insults for imperial core governmental people)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I just steal from old movies: Dog-brained, good-for-nothing, layabout, brickminded, ass-handed, shitspreading, flearidden amateurish ignorant SOCIAL DEMOCRATS.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

those are good, they all imply the person is dumb or lazy or just "bad" tho, I struggle more to find words for calculated uncaring evil, or behavior that flagrantly violates all normal social boundaries in order to do harm, than calling people ignorant, incompetent, or just bad

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Language to go off on someone for being a dickhead that doesn't catch ND or marginalized people in the collateral is a lot more common than language for telling someone their ideas aren't good, which all seem to be predicated on insisting they instead actually have a neurological condition that many people struggle with.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

With the added bit of not necessarily being accurate. Even if they do struggle with the condition, that doesn't mean their idea is bad. The idea being bad is what does.