some mystical place so dissimilar to the US that they can dismiss data from the US as completely irrelevant 🤷♀️
which nostril should I go with
alternate them, and make sure to wash thoroughly with sterile saline spray before you go to bed
you must feel especially important right now since Saturday? 🙃
"yeah, keep doing that and some useless fuck will spectacularly fail to assassinate you, giving a huge boost to your election campaign, take that!"
he doesn't it's a terrible machine learning upscale. which is a weird choice because The Matrix is available in high resolution so whoever upscaled it could have just pulled a better still
even the WHO disagrees, you have been successfully propagandized and are now repeating it
maybe. but piracy is better than either 🏴☠️ (even if just because it doesn't have ads, and shows and movies don't disappear suddenly)
what in tarnation are you talking about?
The monument, in a Montgomery County community known for its synagogues, is dedicated to the 14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the Schutzstaffel — the Nazi military branch often referred to simply as “the SS.”
i think our goals and our analysis is mostly the same, that re-education would be the best option.
but I think that saying "enforcing the threat of it on the rest of society to get homophobia to stop is a good thing" embeds an assumption about the deterrent effect of prison which is not supported by evidence.
and, in terms of harm reduction: in your model, how long do you expect it to take to find "circumstances and resources to do reeducation instead", and are you truly happy with sending people to prison for that entire time, knowing that in most cases people's reactionary views are likely to deepen, and that they are likely to form more social connections with other homophobes while in there?
we can demand re-education now¸and continue building the mechanisms for it in our communities.
at the very least, we can hold back from celebrating the state deploying a known-counterproductive tactic, even when it occasionally claims a worthy motive to.
sounds like the owner of the building should have put in soundproofing
carbrained bullshit from the guardian as usual. do they wanna cite statistics or even a source on "many motorists, however, resent the changes"? of course not, evidence-free bothsidesing of vehicular deaths it is