Note to the Peanut gallery: this guy knows about paperclipmaxxing but not this more famous comic. Curious. lmfao

It’s only ad-hominem if they discredit your points by insulting you. If they read your points and use them to make statements about your character, that’s not ad hominem, that’s valid inference.

You probably need an example. Let’s say Alice and Beelice are having a conversation.

Alice: “I think seed oils are bad for you because RFK Jr. said so! MAGA!”

If Beelice says: “Alice, you are a real sack of potatoes, and therefore you are wrong,” that’s ad hominem.

If Beelice says: “Alice, if you’re going to parrot RFK Jr, then the worms deserve to eat the rotten flesh in your skull,” that’s plain inference.

Understand now, dear?

You can take your piss bottles with you!

Unlike the PHP hammer, the banhammer is very useful for a lot of things. Especially sealion clubbing.

Doesn't really narrow it down, sorry

(jk I don't have beef with the JavaRE)

Tried to see if they have partnered with softbank, the answer is probably not.

With that voice? Rant all you like!

xharts

xcretions

I see. Please forgive this philistine!

I think you should leave.

Shilling AI has much fewer downsides that walking on coals I guess

From the comments:

Sounds like the problem is that they’re doing the exact opposite of sanitizing inputs. Have the developers learned nothing from the tragic story of Little Bobby Tables? Instead of rejecting noise they’re doing everything they can to not only recognize its presence, but actually parsing it for commands.

There’s a few things to sneer at here.

• First up, sanitizing inputs? My guy, LLMco aint got time for that. The LLM is hungry and we can’t steal data fast enough, let alone check inputs.
• Ah yes “rejecting noise”, that thing that something with real ultimate cognition would do.

We missed the target of Artificial Intelligence, but we’ve hit the bullseye of Artificial Pareidolia.

Hey, you got this part right!