eric adams should change his platform to “I’m not cuomo”

Hey, as long as we can learn from this, then we are doing our best to keep this bar nazi-free.

I think it's accurate that the US and England didn't join to stop the Holocaust. Sentence 3 is a little oversimplified, and sentence 4 is straight-up lunacy.

 Rupi Kaur 

   should sue

all of his works are socrappy dialogues (crappy socratic dialogues). This one is an unsubtle exploration of his BDSM fetish

"I'm going to double down on not reading this article herpa derpa gerpa poop" that's you. Please fuck off

Oh yeah, haha. I often face the dilemma dilemma in which I have to choose between ignoring the 'incorrect" usage (i.e. not a choice between two things that are difficult to choose between) and seethe OR mention the correct usage and look like a pedant. Sometimes it's a trilemma, and I'm all over the shop. But more seriously, I usually let it slide and let people use it to mean "a situation".

I doubt that Lorenz has a dilemma in line with the correct usage. I couldn't fight the urge to steelman, spoilered below, which I suspect this is nothing near what Lorenz had in mind.

You’re welcome!

(Though that is a more fun way of looking at things. Perhaps I am just joy-averse?)

can't run a print magazine anymore because of woke

A friend that wants you to have an aggressive brain tumour to make an AI look good is no friend at all

The least interesting member of the gruber family, they wrote him out of die hard 4.

To answer the original question, it’s as simple as the people working on AI are unable to grasp the near term risks (e.g. deepfakes, labor devaluation, climate change from energy use), so they focus on the fun, sci-fi “long term” issues.

So then ofc we have yud here on his usual bullshit talking about some made-up problems that only his giant brain can confabulate.