I get what you're saying, but I feel like this and that are two different things.
I think there are plenty of smart people that understand that Google can and will do this sort of thing, but will also pay them a buttload of money.
I get what you're saying, but I feel like this and that are two different things.
I think there are plenty of smart people that understand that Google can and will do this sort of thing, but will also pay them a buttload of money.
Great, now LLMs are gonna format all their output as email-indented reblog chains.
“used to be” I mean that part tracks at least
dawg if I have to grok rat doublespeak I might just double plus unalive
I stand against confiscatory taxes, totalitarian collectives, and the ideology of the inevitability of the death of every individual,
“And that’s why I’m announcing project Kenjaku-Orochimaru, where I find twinks to transplant my brain into”
So the ethos behind this “research” is that whatever underlying model the AI is using can be “reversed” in some sense, which begs the question: what exactly did these people think they could do beyond a rollback? That they could beg the AI to stop being mean or something?
They were probably inspired by the blanka creation scene from the street fighter movie where they brainwash some guy by showing him video clips of bad stuff and then switch it to showing good stuff.
is this written by a grown man or a 14 year old emo kid
yes
(the MC is jughead from Riverdale lel)
RE: your original comment. Reminded me of this LW post from half a year ago (discussed here)
RE: the followup edit. God, that is sad, and par for the course. Removed from context, I resonate with the youthful hopefulness of thinking you'll change the world, followed by the slightly less youthful hopelessness that changing the world in any meaningful way is much harder than what was quoted. Staying in the orbit of LW, NRx and other right/far right corners of the blagosphere is definitely not setting oneself up for success.
Also yes in their attempts to moderate and elevate their level of discourse, they've hamstrung themselves in many ways, least of all in being able to tell this dude to stop and get some help. It's like 10% of why they seem so humorless, self-serious, and unable to change (the last 90% is because they are humorless, self-serious, and unable to change)
Best case, in their inability to recognise that they already in a cult, they create a schism that eats up the rat community once and for all. Unfortunately rats seem to be schism resistant tho.
I mean what’s a sex cult without a little sects?
(Numbers added by me for easier back references)
Examples of epilogenics
1) Selecting an embryo for lower disease risk, higher intelligence, or some other trait good for both the individual and society
2) Gene editing for the purposes listed above
3) Choosing an attractive spouse
Examples of things that are not epilogenics
4) State-sponsored sterilization of people deemed “unfit”
5) Rules against marriage of family members such a siblings and cousins
6) Things people think of as eugenics even though they are often bad for genes (i.e. genocide)
Other:
Damn, I’m very much in the camp of needing to taste the dish first, at least. Guess we gotta fight
Nah dawg it’s the fact that his “incredible solid and well argued” moral framework finds it impossible to unequivocally denounce a fucking genocide that means that maybe it’s not nearly as solid as you say.