Yeah an inner mental process that has been replicated - well to a (very) limited degree.
Given that you refuse to provide a definition of creativity, this is not something that you (specifically you, not the generic) are allowed to believe.
My argument is that this is exactly what is so offensive to people.
Your argument is wrong. People who are “offended” by AI don’t believe that AI is doing anything that humans are doing beyond formulaic bullshit and plagiarism.
The painful realization or disillusionment that one of the things we held most special about being human, turns out is not so special after all.
If you or a loved one has experienced said painful disillusionment, my advice would be to go outside, touch grass, i.e. experience what it means to be human, because your conception of such is lacking.
I never would have predicted that before GPT-3. I look at movies or stories with a character that is an artistic archetype differently now.
You never saw a robot in fiction, specifically the many robots that are characterised to be all but human? The ones designed to be mirrors to humanity so that we can gain perspective on exactly what makes us human? Roy Batty? Data? Bender Bending Rodriguez?
Meat good! Silicon bad!
They label those packets specifically “do not eat”, I guess you had to learn the hard way.
Oof, I’m out here catching strays from @self