hah, you think these trades are in a 3rd normal form database instead of unsorted excel sheets passed for nightly batch job settling transactions? Nahhhhh fam.
sudoshakes
I work for one of the largest private investment firms in the world.
The scrutiny is something I understand well. We have a lot more thorough checks than his firm does. Real name, kids, spouse, girlfriend living in your house, parents, all part of the review process and more. Significant individuals as well as non-person entities you are tied to in any way.
You could, in theory, still get past it, but you would be doing a lot more money movement to do so.
The front running trades amounted to a total of 6% of all the personal trades he made in that period.
I think he was assuming, that inter dispersed in the group and traded in segments of the sums, it would be hard to dig through the mountain to spot the relationships to the company trades.
Two questions for you!
1.) What is the most useful thing we in the Lemmy community can do to help you get that Oscar?
2.) I have a secret Santa this year coming up in a month that I am a part of with some friends. Would you be interested in leaving a comment for a friend of mine in response to this that I can show them a month from now for the secret santa?
“Hey Rome, this is Margot Robbie wishing you a merry Christmas and happy new year?”, or something like that?
Thanks for being cool either way and good luck getting nominated this year!
We do distinguish primary residence vs non-primary residence for property records. Should be doable to remove the corporate purchases that way.
Slicing by the attributes they give, the two large factors that change the scale significantly are health and variations on predictors for wealth (income and education level)
There is a reason they call it the strong force.
Get stronger or eat wall.
“I don’t want the response to horrific things to be more horrific things inflicted on those who have no control of these events.”
That seems pretty cut and dry..