spacesweedkid27

They still emmit the most, let's see how satellite evidence will change over time.

Yeah this really was a wild moment

Yeah the problem I see with this argument is that of course in an idealised world it would make sense to ban parts of the internet just like banning some kinds of oppinions is based irl.

But I think on the internet is a lot of garbage that has to be there so that people see it, because without allowing some garbage there is no discussion, no new values nor freedom.

I think any kind of left leaning ideology should enable non violent discourse as much as possible. Of course that would mean banning really bad things, but it would not mean complete restriction.

Also as a side note: Banning something does not kill the presence of it in society. In most cases it makes the issue worse than it is: You need more than just a ban, you need to convince people that you're right, not force them into beliving.

This is why fact based propaganda is valuable and a great way to stop populism.

Ok then show me why.

How should I know where somebody is and if you really feel trapped by your location, don't try not to use force to escape, since any kind of violence is justified at that point.

And you're not doing it. Why? Because you don't fucking have to run like many people on the world right now do, because you still do find some kind of rest the way you are trapped.

You got two choices: Either you just carry on and stop commenting such nonsense just to make me angry or you can violently escape and disrupt US capitalism as much as you want which would be based, comrade.

Also on a side note in general for anybody reading, I just think that spraying "western propaganda" on anything you don't like is entitled.

I sure as hell know that I don't know anything, but I know that I don't know enough to say that I do and this is why on toppics like NK and so on I don't trust anybodies oppinion if it is not peer reviewed by multiple not related sources.

Ok insane internet person.

You really just want to make me mad, nothing else. What kind of fucked up way to live is that.

I just wanted to say that eventhough it sucks here I am still embracing my liberties to comment on any post with any oppinion as long as it does not directly hurt somebody.

How deranged must somebody be to not recognise this right?

I think Stoicism is just a smart way to describe doing nothing.

Camus Sisyphus is a better example in my oppinion but the best answer I can relate to is Nitzsches general existential philosophy, e.g. the Übermensch.

Stoicism is just accepting the fact that one can do nothing and therefore trying to ignore it. A lot of people cope with death like this.

Camus and Niztsche suggest that one should grow from the problem: Live happily either way embracing the problem (Camus) or growing because the problem and achieving a greater version of yourself.

(spoiler warning about berserk after the golden age arc)

I'd say femto would win against lara croft, because he literally is invulerable to all physical damage, when he gets reborn, he becomes much stronger but also becomes vulnerable at one day in a month, so if she is careful, she can kill him easily, if we say that he is alone (and zodd is not watching from afar like in berk)

Some time ago I heard that the anarchist cookbook is not recommended and one should use CIA instructions to manufacture improvised explosives etc.

Seeing that video as a child was nuts

Ok, if you all love north korea then why not live in it?

Fun fact: If you do, you'll won't be able to comment here, because they don't allow shit on their internet there in NK, China or Ruissia.