Your comment just so happened to grasp my attention. There's simply no need to resort to ad hominem.

Is the BP oil spill my fault because I drive a car to work?

How on Earth could you derive "I don't give a shit" from "stand up to systems of oppression, don't castigate individuals"? Do your eyes even work?

This type of name and shaming just doesn't scale. You can't recycle your way out of climate change. This type of thinking places the responsibility on the individual, who by very nature is powerless and who's individual actions have essentially no effect on outcome.

These types of sentiments don't scale well into change, but it certainly allows the person making the post to feel good and to let others know they think the right things.

This virtue signaling needs to stop. Yes, the implications for AI are extremely dangerous and foolhardly. Taking out the pitchforks on Brian, an extremely talented and well regarded engineer in the FOSS world, is completely missing the point. It's akin to blaming drivers of gas vehicles for global warming. The impetus for change are on the systems that put these things in place, not a FOSS dev building a WM. The incentive structure of limitless growth at all costs in the IT sector and the unfettered power projection of capital are to blame here. Until you're willing to do something to stand up to that, then we're all just waving our dicks in the wind here. Posting is not praxis.

We get it, you correctly arrived at the conclusion AI is bad. Welcome to the club. Brian Tarricone is a professional and I have no reservations of the quality of this code. You might as well boycott the linux kernel because guess what, AI generated code is in there too.