[-] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago

I still like Ubuntu, as long as everything works, I recommend getting the LTS release.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

So that's like, reading all documents, writing stuff, and I assume it can also make outbound connections to servers?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

They don't have a huge budget. There really aren't that many NYS rangers and they work pretty hard.

In the past they didn't carry guns and focused mostly on search and rescue, appropriate use, etc., but they carry guns now which was not a popular change for a lot of them.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago

The models seem to be getting worse at this one task?

[-] [email protected] 104 points 8 hours ago

People did know about the genocide in WWII. They were flying planes over the camps. But when the soldiers arrived and took pictures the world learned the horrifying details.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

I don't track votes I guess (didn't know you could and I don't really see the point) but you have 1.1k comments.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

When someone says "XYZ" it is a nice/subtle way to say "examine your zipper" (of your pants) / your fly is undone, so the other person can zip it up. I was referencing that as a joke since we spelled it and said goodbye, but perhaps it is not as widespread as I thought.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

“Clearness and vividness in writing often turn on mere specificity. To say that Major André was hanged is clear and definite; to say that he as killed is less definite, because you do not know in what way he was killed; to say that he died is still more indefinite because you do not even know whether his death was due to violence or to natural causes. If we were to use this statement as a varying symbol by which to rank writers for clearness, we might, I think, get something like the following: Swift, Macauley, and Shaw would say that André was hanged. Bradley would say that he was killed. Bosanquet would say that he died. Kant would say that his mortal existence achieved its termination. Hegel would say that a finite determination of infinity had been further determined by its own negation.”

[-] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

HISS hiss HISS hiss
HISS hiss HISS hiss

[-] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago

They could never give a happy ending in that show

[-] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

This will be the result of requiring TPM 2.0 on Windows 11 computers.

24
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
27
Milestone rule... (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Somewhat anti climactic.

21
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Inspired by that other thread about backing in to parking spaces.

20
Camels in the snow rule! (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
66
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Can someone remind me why we stopped using Firefox a while back? There was some piece of news that broke everyone's trust, but I can't remember what Mozilla did. Was it a change in their user agreement?

17
"___ so hot, hot hot ___..." (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
174
Have you Seen Him? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
115
I only post rules (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
41
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I am typing this post on a modern "Thinkpad" from 2020 where the hardware volume keys could never change the volume on Linux. But everything works more or less correctly in Windows 11, unfortunately.

What are my options for getting computer hardware, desktop or laptop (etc.), where the hardware is specifically supported under linux?

Let's say I am wanting to plot a graph with "Usefulness" on the Y axis and "Cost" on the X axis. Then I could plot each computer on the graph, and make a decision about how much money to save up and spend for the best value that satisfied minimum requirements.

In my initial searching, I have uncovered these vendors as supporting Linux, albeit at a (usually) premium, niche price point:

  • System76
  • Framework
  • Dell
  • IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad

However I don't yet have a good intuition for when this is true (for example my thinkpad having incompatible hardware) or where these belong on the hypothetical usefulness vs. cost plot.

Also, as I understand it, linux distros are not in the habit of "supporting" specific hardware as "works on our distro." However in the past some have attempted to keep track of what works better than other things. I am hoping for a legitimate guarantee that the hardware I buy will not have hardware problems with the distro it supports. At least for some time.

My personal "minimum" requirements would be: feels "snappy" loading the OS and webpages/videos/media. The touchpad and keyboard are fully usable. All the hardware works correctly, and DPI/screen resolution doesn't cause scaling issues (or said another way, fractional scaling doesn't cause problems. Maybe this is unrealistic if I want to use arbitrary software like hexchat which is GTK2).

Let me know if I'm thinking about this in the right way or missing something.

EDIT: thank you everyone for your suggestions!

25
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Ok, so. Earlier today I was watching the Technology Connections video about how Power is energy over time. In the video he shows a picture of an Anker Solix powerbank to illustrate the concept of energy storage. I've never seen or heard of this product before.

An hour later I'm reading an article on Lemmy, and there is an ad for that same powerbank.

What explains this? Some explanations I can think of:

  1. Random chance.
  2. Google scans YouTube videos for information about what products appear in them, and knows that I watched the video, and that I'm the same person now reading the article. It then gives this information to everyone in the ad-selling marketplace, so the Anker ad company can bid high to show me an ad.
  3. Google is observing what appears on my screen in order to sell this info to advertisers.

I think 2 is most likely given Occam's Razor, but I didn't think Google scanned yt videos like this.

Is there something I'm missing?

I was watching on an Android phone, on Tubular. My browser is IronFox. I'm surprised that Google can follow my activity from one app to the other... this is probably based on IP address, but I wonder what other device fingerprinting tubular and IronFox expose...

98
Tumblule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

sem

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 11 months ago