ruinsalljokes

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Our population is on average younger than the rest of Canada... hence why they feel entitled to 52% of the cpp

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Surely our population will also never age

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You're right but there always a fear that I'd be splitting the vote by going NDP. I think I'll stick to my guns this election.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

....given our countries previous voting patterns it's unlikely to happen next election. And considering I'm from Alberta my NDP vote doesn't amount to much.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I would love to give the NDP a chance but alas...

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Considering the gravity of indicting a former president I imagine the investigation needed to be thorough

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

We'll have to agree to disagree on whether something is the right thing to do if it's considered the standard.

I understand where you're coming from and there could be a lot of scenarios where adoption is a good option but at the end of the day homosexual couples don't necessarily have the chance of both being biological parents like heterosexual couples do. What you're describing is equality, but I would argue that it's also discriminatory.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Standard or not (which I checked in Canada it varies by province), it's still a step backwards and creates unnecessary stress for already existing family units. That's not even including the extra paperwork, time, and money spent by all parties involved just to fix a parental rights issue that didn't exist. So how is this an issue that effects the people other than negatively?