How “profitable” are our fire departments? Our wildfire services?

How much “revenue” does the RCMP bring in?

Are our road crews and highways divisions being sufficiently “economically viable”?

All this hand-wringing about Canada Post is an alt-right psi-op designed to be one of many wedges designed to facilitate trickle-up economics; to impoverish the working class in favour of the Parasite Class.

Canada Post has no business being privatized. It exists to serve Canadians independently of any profit margin, and I would eagerly argue in spite of any “losses”.

People always forget that abortion - at least in sane places - is the mothers choice,

I would still call that insane, however it’s only half as insane as no abortion rights at all.

The only truly sane option are abortion rights for all… including men. It’s called a paper abortion.

And before anyone goes clutching their pearls and asking “what about the child?”, the only possible response is -- WHAT CHILD?? The “child” is a fetus within the first trimester, it has no needs beyond what the mother’s body is providing it. There is nothing to support until at least six months after the man has that opportunity to “abort”.

And if the woman wants that child, she then has the opportunity to decide if she wants it without a legally-coerced ATM.

Paper abortions are truly equal rights made manifest, providing to the man all the same rights to “abort” as the woman does, at least from a legal perspective. Because all any kind of abortion is, is the ability to no longer have any responsibility over the fetus. The only thing a woman’s abortion adds is the physical removal of the fetus.

"Deadbeat dads" are a perfect example of this, where men who obviously weren't ready to become a parent, is put in a position that will make their lives worse.

A fair minority were, but the legal systems in many areas are not designed to let them be a father once the woman decided that the relationship was over.

That when the woman is treated by the legal system as the “presumed caregiver”, the best option that most men have - that does not lead to life-long poverty as an ATM, or serious psychological damage, or both - is to just walk away.

So I appreciate the olive branch, but the details are a lot more ugly and less simple than what you broached.

there's the gender pay gap

Oh, you poor little ignorant gender bigot. The “gender pay gap” DOES NOT EXIST to any meaningful degree.

This pernicious bigoted thing was “created” by taking the pay of all women, and dividing it against the pay of all men. It is quite literally comparing the pay of male lawyers against female baristas.

The truth is that when you take into account the career chosen, the specialties acquired, the hours worked, the overtime accepted, the riskiness of the work conducted and the willingness to work on-call, the actual “wage gap” falls to between 0% and 3%, depending on industry examined.

And in many metro regions, women now out-earn men. Where are the calls to close that “wage gap”?? crickets

Finally, Google was charged with underpaying women, yet when they investigated in 2019, the vast majority of “gender pay gaps” they found were men being underpaid. Not women. Men.

social dogma and beauty standards

Women have only themselves to blame. For the most part, women don’t doll themselves up for men - they do so to dominate other women and to establish a social pecking order based on how much resources (male wealth) they have access to.

It’s why two women at a fancy/prestigious public event will have meltdowns because they’re wearing the same dress - as in, economizing because they chose a male that’s too poor to provision her a unique dress - yet not a single man will give a single shit about two women wearing the same dress, and they themselves will be wearing highly similar if not identical suits and tuxedoes.

In reality, a large proportion men are either ambivalent about makeup or even dislike extensive makeup. It’s why almost all apps that strip away makeup in videos and photos were developed by men as a tool to see the real woman underneath. It’s why “catfishing” is nearly always a woman-on-man deception.

forcibly circumcize them

looks at rates of male circumcision, and how it negatively affects men in similar ways

You’re… being facetious and ironic, right?

Having your sexual organ half sliced off is not the sole domain of women. It’s occurrence in men - with many well-documented negative side effects - is many orders of magnitude more prevalent.

Like, FGM doesn’t even rate as a rounding error if we include it in all genital mutilation. Is it bad? Sure. Should it be stopped? Of course. But it’s blown wildly out of proportion.

girls and women across the world being subjugated

Granted, almost all studies show girls and women being a majority of slaves across the planet.

However, almost all studies also conspicuously exclude forced military conscription from that same definition. Include that, include all of the child fighters across the many guerrilla conflicts currently in play, include the men sent to fight on very real threats of long incarceration or even summary execution, and men would make up 90-95% of the victims.

Women don’t hold an edge on being actual victims, as much as the ideology of mainstream feminists/female-supremacists need it to be. A good chunk of their “victimizations” are either based on statistical lies or are outright self-inflicted.

When young people face a system explicitly designed to extract as much wealth out of them as possible, nerfing their economic potential well into adulthood via crushing debt, is such a response really that unexpected?

Criticizing men is a must, and a duty.

Criticizing women is misogyny.

Women are very well insulated from responsibility and the consequences of their own actions. One needs to only look at many of the “male crimes” that they hoist and froth over to see this in action. For example:

• 71% of nonreciprocal domestic violence is women beating up men
  • Many police precincts are forced to use the Duluth Model, which frames men as the only possible aggressor
  • Many police precincts still use software where the DV perps are hard-coded as male, and the victim as female, which allows the charges against female perps to be more easily thrown out on technicalities.
  • I have seen attestations from police where unwritten rules existed that forbid them from arresting women to avoid political blowback, and forced them to arrest the men, even if they were being carried out on a stretcher by EMS.
• Women rape men as frequently as men rape women
  • It took the FBI until 2015 to even begin collecting stats on women-on-man rapes because before that they refused to categorize that as rape.
  • As above, many police precincts cannot even record a rape victim as male, due to how the victim’s gender is hard-coded, and most police won’t even try to record the crime because the process requires them to conduct a female rape kit - which a male victim cannot satisfy.
• https://www.queermajority.com/essays-all/success-men-now-face-more-hiring-discrimination
• For the same crime with the same damages, the gender sentencing gap is three times larger than the wealth sentencing gap, and seven times larger than the racial sentencing gap. Having been born female is the largest single “get out of jail free” card a person could possibly hold.
• Pretty much anything by TheTinMen.

Honestly, I have poked my nose into some femcel groups on places like Reddit, and those groups would make the incel subreddits look like rank amateurs where gender bigotry is concerned. Men have nothing on women when it comes to hating the opposite gender. They are so far behind the curve that women are blazing that I’m shocked they’re even a going concern.

And this is across the entire population, and not just among femcels - there are three times as many women under 30 hating men as men under 30 hating women.

A hyphen is required to specify that the pedophiles are eating children, and not that the child is eating pedophiles.

Even Wozniak has said that while Jobs wasn’t a good engineer, he did know enough to be strategically savvy.

Edited in hindsight for clarity.

Holy fuck that late-80s vibe is going hard, there.

Finally, the bean counter steps down so that an engineer can take the reins again.

I mean, at least he didn’t fuck things up like so many other bean counters have. But he was only ever a bean counter.

Luigi, where are you?

It was a different era. Only the poorest women wore only flats, and a large number of women wore heels everywhere except on soft ground. Basically from when they stepped out of bed in the morning until they went to bed at night. Granted, they may not have been particularly high heels, but they were stereotypical high heels.

JFC, dude came boiling out of a shadow on the wall.

I had to watch it three times before I saw what the camera angle showed as a barely-there nook in the wall.

This is what heroes do. They run towards the danger, not away.

The core purpose of libertarianism is to enhance trickle-up economics. The wealthy 1% benefit and make off like gangbusters, everyone else loses.