peoplebeproblems

joined 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

"Uh, wasn't me." -Sec Def

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ok the hawk tua girl was funny

But how the fuck does it make sense in slang

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Somebody get this man an MBA

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, honestly, I think a lot of us are.

Because honestly? Fuck being quiet. If they're busy imprisoning me, they're not busy executing someone else. If they're busy executing me, well, then, I don't really have long to worry about it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Yes. Access control is not in scope of Signal, I updated my comment to correct my statement.

I would however enjoy being a fly on the wall when someone has to explain what application or system scope is to Trump.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Man you're technically correct.

The best kind of correct. Let me alter my comment and direct them to this, because I didn't even think that far.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, that would be impressive. Because it's open source, you can audit it yourself. The cryptography of it is secure. Unless the government has a secret way of breaking these encryption algorithms which we are unaware of, there is no backdoor.

I've only dug into the user to user messaging, but I'm group messaging is just as secure.

The only thing that was lacking when I read through it was key transparency. And that's a problem with every end to end encryption service. HOWEVER I know work is being done on implementing it. That will alleviate the fears of the wrong public keys being used (aka, you're talking to someone different than you thought).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

~~"Non-secure systems" uh. No. Systems that aren't in the US control is what you mean.~~

As @[email protected] pointed out, Signal is insecure as in the access to the message wasn't controlled. It's like stripping naked in front of an open window with the lights on in your house. Yeah, technically, you are inside your home where it's private. But if you aren't pulling the shades everyone gonna see it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Trump is probably all confused because he thought it was end to end encrypted and now he can't understand how the guy got the messages.

He pulled the ol CC/BCC mistake.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Correct. Our revenge is human rights. Our revenge is helping each other. Our revenge is a better world.

That's why we can call it that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

It's a strange way to call yourself strong. Seems more like broadcasting being an idiot, but here we are.

view more: ‹ prev next ›