nsrxn

joined 3 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s YOUR fault no matter how you twist reality.

the only people to blame for Trump's presidency are the people that voted for him and funded him. like Hilary Clinton.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

what did contrapoints do?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

gore won that election, so i don't know what your point is here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

obama ran on the famous deportation mantra si se puedes, and ran out of bombs killing brown people. just because you're concerned about one facet, doesn't make it less fascist

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

absurd ideological basis (anarchy supporters)

I am not a community but can you please add me to your list

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

... bring your own mouse. keep it in your locker. your parents are at work. your siblings are at school. it's nbd.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

lower in calories

not everyone wants that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They allowed racist, misogynistic fascism to take firm root, good luck weeding it out now.

was that in the progressive era, when eugenics and fascism were the rage? the usa is fascist, and has been for all of living memory. blue-colored or red-colored isn't less fascism.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

they follow their own processes, use their own research, and come to their own conclusions based on what they consider to be the best available evidence.

some of that evidence was a paper which has since expired. if those organizations aren't updating their positions at least as frequently as the AND is, then we cannot believe that their positions are any more valid than the expired AND paper that they relied on

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

the expired paper doesn’t matter. It has no relevance

it's the exact paper linked in the initial comment to which I replied.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And the page about childhood nutrition:

I wasn't reading carefully. I missed this. it doesn't change whether the other paper expired, is the current position of the academy, or whether papers that relied on it should be considered reliable unless they update.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

it's written on the paper itself: it expired in december of 2021, and is no longer the position of teh academy.

view more: ‹ prev next ›