They know they can't trust the media, yet they trust everything the media publishes that's convenient to confirm their works views.
People are not logical. We don't pull all of them to our side at once. The work is hard. But I'm happy we're here for each other. Everyone is welcome. :)
But also, isn't fascism in the rise, in Indonesia?
Just heard something mentioned about that from someone in a live, but didn't follow through. Did you see anything about it in your daily research?
I see you.
Thats why I said the vibe is off, but it's hard to pinpoint which issue I have.
I think the main issue is the lack of opportunity for discussion on the material you posted. These matters are hard to make sense of, and are too easy to be shifted back into oppression. It happens with the radfem, or black supremacist ideas. It's even more dangerous for men, since we're already in the oppressors position, most of the time.
The question you pose is a good one. How do we welcome and embrace men that suffered abuse? There's lots of us. The synthesis of the content you offer, if followed through, has dangerous social side effects that have to be considered, and are not generally aligned to recent communist consensus. It can be challenged, sure. But just posting without discussing isn't a proper challenge.
The problem is patriarchy. The problem is the work relationships. The problem is exploration of people by people, suppression of their needs.
Implied on what you post is "stop looking at woman's problems, look at men's problems!". That's not the best approach, and I think it would be freeing to you to try to figure out why.
You got any sauce I can send my English speaking friends?
I have stupidly linked Hasan thinking of Hakim. Sorry about the mistake!
I think I like some version of "I stand with the oppressed".
It will take a while before bonjoursie is systematically oppressed and I have to think of something else. But for now, it feels like it mostly works.
Agree?
I think Marx is only alive in our hearts.
It's a bit more plausible that we're having chairman Xi, instead.
Have you seen people overrate "common sense"? That's it.
Don't think deeply, go for common sense, disregard the specialists, we can't understand their areas of study, therefore they are lying.
Also, avoid studying humanities: history, philosophy, sociology, politics. That will make you poor! Stay technical and mathy, don't worry about anything else other than making money! Have a life project! Get rich!
That's the anti intellectual speech.
Who benefits from the smart peoples of the world not questioning the status quo, and the building blocks of capitalism?
Why is this question asked here every 2 weeks?
That's why FOSS software matters. FOSS software companies can't change policies like that, for what's already distributed.
One only look into politics if they need to.
When you have a comfortable life there's no objective reason to question the structure of power are oneself is immersed into.
Because programmers generally get a comfortable lifestyle from the compensation for their work, they can easily believe that wages generally correlates to skill and effort, becoming completely oblivious to the concept of surplus value. From that point on they are susceptible to reinforcing dominant ideology.
Speaking as a programmer trying to rally the class. It's hard! Too much anecdotal evidence that things are fine, apparently. But I want to believe tides are starting to change.
I just want to thank the comrades here for your links, your summaries, your curation, your analysis, your opinions, and your memes.
You make the Internet a better place.