maol

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The mask is off for silicon valley

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This is just like the flat tax. To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, for every social welfare benefit, there is a "reform" which is simpler, easier, and totally wrong.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

in the UK some people were able to almost use the dole like a UBI during the crushing recession of the late 70s and 80s - take the payments without looking for a new job, and spend the time doing non-profit or low-profit work like art, music or political organizing. What's changed? UK benefit system is now geared to harrass the long-term unemployed into work, the actual amount of money is much lower than it used to be, and the costs of housing has ballooned due the end of social housing and increasingly hostile laws against squatting.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

As we all know, the rich have no conflicts of interest with the poor. No siree....

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I bloody knew it. Years ago I saw an anarchist say "UBI could just be implemented as a way to destroy the social welfare system and turn it all into one meagre benefit that can be turned on and off, like Universal Credit in the UK". And here this guy comes .....

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is this the "flying saucer fails to land" moment for him? AIs (large language models, ai-generated images, etc etc) are now within the experience or understanding of more and more people, and he can't just make stuff up about it anymore?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I ain't reading all that.

Why does he have such a serious case of expertise (ok, "expertise") creep? Who gives a fuck what the AI weirdo thinks about diets?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

this is just conversion therapy with extra steps.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I would be reluctant to go to an irl sneer club. I do like the idea of some sort of "sneer-in" to inform local activist organizations and politically active people about these groups and their cursed ideology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Think you're right, sorry

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That famous shtetl "feminists attack nerds :((( because they're easy targets >:((" is worse in context . The blog post was about how Harvard were wrong to take down videos of physics lectures by a sexual harrasser they just sacked, because they were really good physics lectures you guys. And there were all these appalling comments that Scott didn't give any pushback to - instead, he lit into the one woman in the comments section. for suggesting that nerds commit sexual offences.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hate this stuff. Bullying someone for being fat is about as likely to make the obesity rate go down as calling people who wear glasses "four-eyes" is going to reduce the rates of astigmatism.

Yes the average weight in the west has gone up, and this isn't great, but more people being fat is a symptom, not a cause of higher rates of lifestyle diseases, and higher rates of lifestyle diseases have been caused by social changes over which fat people have no control, like the rise of the automobile and processed food.

view more: ‹ prev next ›