[–] 5 points 1 week ago

Finally read Watchmen for the first time recently and yeah, it is really good. Having the plot spoiled for me years ago took some of the enjoyment out of it for me, but there was still a lot in there to enjoy and think about. And anyone who's read it will know how it chimes with TESCREAL criticism....

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago

    Émile Torres writing last year:

    [...] Nick Beckstead, a noted EA, argued in 2013 that, given the “overwhelming” moral importance of the far future — “millions, billions, and trillions” of years from now — we should prioritize saving the lives of people in rich countries over those in poor countries, other things being equal. The reason is that people in rich countries are better positioned to influence the far future.

    And that about sums it up. They don't care. They simply don't care. Beckstead explains that it's better to focus on the rich countries because "rich countries have substantially more innovation" and "their workers are more economically productive". He apparently presented these ideas in a graduate thesis: I hope he got a bad grade.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago*

    #3 suggests that people in tech have gotten way wayyy too comfortable with saying "hey, I know that company's evil, but it's a really good job" about companies that make software for arms manufacturers or ICE or surveillance, so of course people who think AI might kill us all think it's ok to work for AI companies even if it might cause an extermination.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    I'm already thinking about complaining about some of the stuff he's said¹, so that might be a good idea. However I think my university's policy for students is that you can use AI to start research, summarise notes etc. so he might not be breaking any rules.

    ¹ Inappropriate questions to students. Not sexually inappropriate, just inappropriate.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Hell is a university lecturer who not only hands out AI-generated summaries of his lecture to the class, but uses AI to generate diagrams and infographics for his lecture slides.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    What does he think all the suddenly unemployed and angry masses are gonna do in this scenario? Twiddle their thumbs? Or does he think there's gonna be some sort of mass killing of the surplus labour?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    God help us. These workers are employed by a subcontractor, Covalen.

    Multiple workers from Covalen’s ‘AI annotation’ service spoke to The Journal Investigates about their roles. Their day-to-day work involves creating prompts that are fed to Meta’s AI platform so the system can be trained according to guidelines.

    In order to do this, some workers have spent entire shifts pretending to be paedophiles online seeking child sex abuse related information, or suicidal people looking for details on how to kill or hurt themselves.

    Covalen also does moderation for Meta, with workers forced to watch extremely violent and disturbing footage that has been flagged for moderation.

    “Sometimes in my dreams I am the victim, but sometimes – and this is far worse – I am the perpetrator,” they said.

    One bright spot:

    Over 100 Covalen employees have now joined the Communications Workers Union (CWU). The toll that dealing with sensitive content and inconsistencies in wellness break length were extra motivating factors for the move.

    They are also asking for a better rate of pay, as they are currently earning an average of €29,700 per year.

     

    Interview on Australian anti-fascist radio show Yeah Nah Pasaran! with Dan McQuillan, computer lecturer and author of "Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach To Artificial Intelligence". Interesting comments on AI as a tool of/for austerity politics, and an argument that AI is inherently anti-worker. Probably nothing new to people in here, but eloquently stated and put into a wider political context.

     

    Sure, why attempt to improve the climate resilience or affordable housing in the cities where millions of people already live, when you can just buy land upstate and get a whole new toy to play with? And why tell local, state or national government anything - they'll only be supplying the land, water, sewerage, utilities & transport links. You pay your taxes, you deserve to get something back.

    This is going to be one hell of a planning application. What's the land use code for "feudal stronghold"?

    view more: next ›