And birdychat is professional only.
trop tard, la propagande a été faite.
Capitalism is built on the notion that wealth is virtue.
That's one of the excuses. Whatever period and place, there is a different ideology provided to explain the concentration of wealth.
Details here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_and_Ideology
Why do Republicans hate the poor so much?
For the rich: money reduces empathy. There a a few funny studies on the matter, including one on lottery winners. Plus the very wealthy live in their own bubble.
For the poor: propaganda. Lack of education in logic, sociology, macroeconomics, human relationships. A complete education is not all math and literature and hard science.
trying everything they can to harm people who need any sort of assistance?
The power-hungry want power, control, coercion. Through media power, cronyism they allied with the ultra rich who have power and want docile workers.
The dominated Republicans are fighting the ghost of people abusing the system, afraid of change, hiding in conservatism, backing into 1930s racism. They didn't think the powerful Republicans would cut their help, only do something about their fears.
Pretend I am rich? Like how much money am I getting back by Republicans kicking men off healthcare or destroying insurance for those who need it most. It must be alot right?
It's not about economics: healthcare and general welfare have a net positive impact, up to the point of housing homeless people costs globally less than having them on the street.
Personal gain is really at stake only when said service is repurchased by friends of the government, e.g. medical research, police, military, roads anything can go. Helping the poor can't really be sold. Policing them, yes.
I agree with the first part but simplify the "why they'd do it":
As for the rest, from what I've seen:
Consumers will like it, then enshitificaction. Also your data anywhere in the world.
C’est le double de la moyenne européenne, en raison d’une hiérarchie très autoritaire, d’une absence de dialogue social,
Ces écoles sont interconnectées avec le monde de l’entreprise, une partie de leurs intervenants en sont issus. Et elles pressentent qu’aborder le sujet de ces risques psychosociaux croissants reviendrait forcément à devoir admettre que le management est, pour l’heure, défaillant en France.
Je simplifie:
Deux produits différents avec des contraintes, avantages, et des risques différents.
Tu peux parfaitement interdit le tabac (aucun intérêt, dépendance de merde) et autoriser le cannabis (en limitant par exemple a l'herbe non modifiée qui se fumait pure).
Merci.
Débat ici pour ceux que ça intéresse: https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/issues/3224
To be clear:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking.
Vs.
https://grokipedia.com/page/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking.
Grok explains itself:
Co-founder Larry Sanger has argued since 2020 that the platform exhibits a pronounced left-wing slant, attributing it to the exclusion of conservative viewpoints via policies that deem non-mainstream outlets unreliable, even when they report verifiable facts overlooked by establishment media.[89] This is evident in the Reliable Sources guideline, which prioritizes legacy media—often critiqued for institutional left-leaning tendencies—over primary data or alternative analyses, effectively blacklisting sites like those affiliated with the Daily Wire or Breitbart unless corroborated elsewhere
page count differs between international A4 vs US letter formats.
Dans un grand bol de strychnine
Délayez de la morphine
Faites tiédir a la casserole
Un bon verre de pétrole
Quelques gouttes de ciguë
De la bave de sangsue
Un scorpion coupe très fin
Emiettez votre arsenic
Dans un verre de narcotique
Deux cuillères de purgatif
Qu'on fait bouillir à feu vif
Dans un petit plat à part
Tiédir du sang de lézard
La valeur d'un dé à coudre
Vous versez la mort-aux-rats
Dans du venin de cobra
Pour adoucir le mélange
Pressez trois quartiers d'orange
Décorez de fruits confits
Moisis dans du vert-de-gris
Tant que votre pâte est molle
Ajustée les ingrédients selon votre goût.
On peut ajouter du vitriol.
China is not communist. Communism entails a classless society. China has social classes. And by definition any dictatorship has a ruler class.