Wikipedia works because of the vigilant team of volunteers maintaining its quality. Let's see how Musk is going to do that 😏
post
replies:
What the hell ? Why that man is this much interested in destroying useful platforms and internet ?
replies:
Their biggest and saddest win, is making truth debatable.
replies:
Fascists making a tool that does nothing but steal Other people’s work is so on brand for them. They’re incapable of making anything original.
I, too, can print out wikipedia articles and use them to wipe my ass. And I don't even need AI!
replies:
what
replies:
To be clear:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking.
Vs.
https://grokipedia.com/page/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking.
Grok explains itself:
Co-founder Larry Sanger has argued since 2020 that the platform exhibits a pronounced left-wing slant, attributing it to the exclusion of conservative viewpoints via policies that deem non-mainstream outlets unreliable, even when they report verifiable facts overlooked by establishment media.[89] This is evident in the Reliable Sources guideline, which prioritizes legacy media—often critiqued for institutional left-leaning tendencies—over primary data or alternative analyses, effectively blacklisting sites like those affiliated with the Daily Wire or Breitbart unless corroborated elsewhere
As long as this doesn't become a source for Wikipedia
replies:
So basically all of Wikipedia's errors plus new errors from grok? Amazing
But can we also increasingly let chat bots edit Wikipedia itself, please? Oh, we are? Great
In a time when attention is considered a currency, why are we sharing stuff like this???
i might use this once, point and laugh at it and go back to using Wikipedia.
replies:
Fuckedy fuck fuck donkeyshit. Just my personal opinion of his latest idea.
Am I the only person who immediately thought that Musk will end up suing Wikipedia for infringing on "his" content?
all 34 comments