[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago

Problem is you can't trust anything. The fancy $2k machine might just be fancy in name. You don't know if stuff is good before it starts not being. And reviews don't help, because they won't test a product for 5 years to check durability before posting

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

This slap question was a big meme several years ago, and when that video came out (years after the meme), it was an instant hit.

The fact that this discussion is still going shows how popular it is

[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago

"somedays I don't even eat"

Mf getting all their calories from OJ

68
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Writing things the wrong way is part of learning, goddamn microsoft.

Work pc so I can't just change to linux unfortunately

[-] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago

And when I say I don't trust judges and that the justice system of most places is broken for giving a single person the final decision power, based on whatever they think is right, people say I'm trolling.

Judges pull decisions out of their ass to fulfill whatever interest they have. Or sometimes just because they are stupid.

Good judges are super rare.

11
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I got the combat patrol some time ago and want to do a big upgrade to 2000 points.

I would like to use invocatus/lord on juggernaut (one or both) since I got used to them.

Lord of Skulls is non-negotiable because I loved the model

Which of these options would you choose? (Or even suggest something else)

fixed: Angron (435) LoS (450) 10 Jakhals (65) (someone has to get VP) fixed points: 950

option 1: Invocatus (140) Lord on juggernaut + favoured of khorne(100) 2x 10 berzerkers (2 x 180) 3 eightbound (140) 2x 3 exalted eightbound (2x 155)

option 2: Invocatus (140) master of executions (110) 10 jakhals (65) 3x 3 eightbound (3x 140) 2x 3 exalted eightbound (2x 155)

option 3: Invocatus (140) lord on juggernaut (80) master of executions + glaive(135) 10 jakhals (65) 10 berzerkers (180) 3 eightbound (140) 2x 3 exalted eightbound (2x 155)

option 4: lord on juggernaut (80) master of executions + glaive(135) 10 berzerkers (180) 3x 3 eightbound (3x 140) 3 exalted eightbound (155) 2 chaos spawn (70) or 1 rhino (75)

[-] [email protected] 36 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What part of it is malicious? From what I understood, it is a illegal music downloading platform, and they say it opens its users to "legal action".

Are we calling pirating-enabling software malicious now? Because pirating is ilegal?

[-] [email protected] 49 points 5 months ago

I took it as "don't pretend we don't have censorship too"

[-] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

Microsoft having IE/Edge as the default browser has already cost them in the past. I don't think Apple faced anything with Safari.

The problem today with chrome is how prevalent it is and how that influences the main product of the internet (advertising), which happens to be Google's mais product too. Apple can at least make the argument that they make their money with the hardware, not the browser.

Either way, I think all OS should at least give you a list of browsers on first use to choose from.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

you know this is the internet and you are allowed to type whatever you want, right? let me show you: "retarded"

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

I always laugh at people that never saw a pacu

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

in part yes, because it contributed to global warming. we are almost in winter and most of the country has summer temps. that mass of hot air encounters cold masses from the antarctic, causing heavy rain.

Rain like this is atypical because it shouldn't be this hot in may

[-] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago

it is not ai generated, that photo is from 2014. it is highly edited by the original photographer

[-] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago

chrome and edge use chromium, so everything is 1:1 compatible. you can't do the same with firefox: extensions work differently, several options will be different, any custom layouts will be missing so things look different, etc

view more: next ›

kiagam

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago