No one is saying Chrome is the ethical choice, why are you reducing this to a 2 options choice?
ivn
joined 1 year ago
Well, as much as I hate Google I don't think that's the intention of this particular point, rolling out big changes gradually is standard.
All of them except uBlock Origin are in Arkenfox "Do not bother" extension list: https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions#-dont-bother
It started in june, for now it's just showing a warning saying that the extension will soon no longer be supported. They'll be disabled gradually until the beginning of 2025.
https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate/mv2-deprecation-timeline
I don't know, I've seen answers to this so many times on Lemmy.
- CEO is also homophobic and a covid skeptic
- the browser used to modify crypto exchange URLs to add it's affiliate code to it
- it used to collect donations for content creators without their consent
That's not the same. DNS blocking is great but it can't block as well as a proper ad blocker.
Wait, I would have thought this was a myth too but that's where it comes from. American would rather give litter for their child to poop in while hiding than tackle school shooting.
You really shouldn't connect windows 7 to the internet.
He had the book Β« Le vertige de l'Γ©meute: de la Zad aux Gilets jaunes Β» (The Vertigo of the Riot: From the ZAD to the Yellow Vests) in his car according to some French article.
But it's not run in a sandbox. I'm not sure where you get this from.
There are actually no alternative browser on iOS. Before the European Digital Market Act all iOS browser have to use webkit, so while you could install Firefox, Chrome and others, they were actually using Safari's rendering engine. I believe that's where a lot of the limitations come from. Now with the DMA Firefox could use it's own rendering engine but this hasn't landed yet. I don't know if any other browser has switched from webkit yet.