[-] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

You can call VPNs illegal, but you can't enforce it.

You could make them require age verification for example, or you could ban commercial VPN's and only allow self-hosted ones.

Neither is enforceable. You can theoretically detect VPN traffic, but you can't tell if it's commercial or not. Even the detectable part will no longer be true if you make VPNs illegal, as providers will work towards "indetectability". You can have a list of known IPs, but unless the entire world follows you in your ban, that is pointless.

They could also do what Utah did and make it so that you effectively can't access any websites with a VPN

That law existing is more of a demonstration than an actual law, as it is also unenforceable. Sure, you can have a list of known IPs, but that's definitely not reliable and easy to work around.

Most laws about the internet are unenforceable unless you simply turn it off. That's why piracy is still an "issue" despite it costing rights owners a gigantic amount of money and therefore not lacking incentive to deal with. That's why even China and Russia, who are trying to control their network as much as possible, are still unable to enforce their VPN restrictions properly. Even if the US turned fully fascist they wouldn't be able to enforce a VPN ban.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

You can't make VPNs illegal. There is a lot of infrastructure dependent on VPNs.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

I'd argue that it is wildly different to vide coding.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

While they work amazing, they're supposed to be temporary fixes (for instance, when medication affects your bowel movements). Your body, with the right nutrition, should not need anything extra to shit properly!

[-] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

When I went vegan I saw change in my shits within a week. Turns out animal products make shit shits!

And I don't even eat healthy. Just no animal products.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago

If history had been allowed to witness the two (not to mention Himmler) truly brought to justice on a world stage, could it have potentially decreased the chances others would feel emboldened enough to follow in their footsteps?

I highly doubt it. Power thirsty assholes won't be stopped so easily.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

Well this is getting weird.

Have you tried checking if your os has a resolution cashe active? If so, try to flush it.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I have read the rest of the comments to see what you already tried. I was about yo tell you to use sysctl to disable ipv6 but it looks like that is already done.

As a matter of fact, it looks like you have no ipv6 address at all. Which makes me think that your DNS config might be off, as it shouldn't even attempt an ipv6 resolution.

Can you show me the content of /etc/resolv.conf ?

Also install "dig" if you dont have it already and show the output of

dig registry-1.docker.io
[-] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What version of Pi OS are you running?

(we can move to DMs if you wish, it will be less polluting, or stay in the comment thread if you don't feel safe in DMs)

[-] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

And I didn't follow why a walkable city will have more green spaces. Surely in a capitalism we'll still have strong pressure to fill most of that.

Well yes, but a walkable city is already something that doesn't really align with hardcore capitalism. And if your goal is a walkable city, then you need to make it enjoyable. Most people don't enjoy walking through endless grey.

Although yes, in Europe, city leaderships that care about that are usually on the left side of the political spectrum.

Point is, a walkable city has no advantage to capitalism. So it's a safe assumption that a leadership pushing for it is not really that capitalist.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

The danger of vibe coding is that the people doing it either don't have the skills to or don't think it's importsnt to review the AI changes.

If you work with an AI and instead of taking time typing through boring tasks, take time reading through the changes, them there isn't much of an issue. A skilled software engineer is capable of noticing logic errors in a code they read.

If the generated code is too unmecessarily complex to ensure its logic is okay, then scrap it.

I don't use it in that way (only use JetBrains' line completion AI) but I don't see a problem if it is used that way.

However, if I review a code that was partly generated by AI and notice that the dev let through shitty code without review, the review will be salty.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

It depends on the type of tiles you use. Paris has a lot of tiled roads in pedestrian centric areas, they've been there for decades and are not more damaged than asphalt. They're changed every 15 years or so, from my experience living with a neigbborhood like this nearby.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

iglou

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago