It isn't spelled out because it is not a logical conclusion at all. Nothing in this test requires critical thinking to achieve.
Why are you defending an obviously terribly written article?
It isn't spelled out because it is not a logical conclusion at all. Nothing in this test requires critical thinking to achieve.
Why are you defending an obviously terribly written article?
Not sure where you get that claim from. Even here, in the Netherlands, where the housing market is through the roof, it's not that expensive to own a basic house (maybe it would be in Amsterdam but that's far from the average european city experience)
Unless "basic" for you means 4 bedrooms in the city center.
As someone replied before me, monero is one example. There is more, though.
But that's never going to be government promoted, and I'll be content with any form of digital currency, cause fuck the banks taking a share of every transaction :')
They won't get far without the support of Americans. Vance won't rally the Trump cultists.
It's not an actual dictatorship. Yet.
Yeah, considering it is not impossible to geoblock per instance, they could.
That "help" only happened because Germany started a world war
Most countries don't just interfere with other countries' politics... although I know that's a hard concept to grasp for the USA haha
Haha. Ha.
Are you sure it's not a problem specific to your headphones or your phone? Unless you've got some sort of prosthetics/pacemaker or something like that your torso should definitely not be causing interferences.
Well, it's not like there was a donation campaign to finance the war in Ukraine.
A country's budget is complex and compromises have to be made. You have to deal with more than one issue. The security of Europe is important as well as the purchasing power of nationals.
Moving from a car to a bike is a choice, though. Become a cyclist :)
Not at all. There is many ways to rationalize time, nothing is settled at all. The "settled theory" you talk about would create paradoxes, if time travel is ever made real. And paradoxes don't work well with reality.
There is actually a fairly common way to rationalize time that is the opposite of what you're describing: Time is entirely a construct, there is no past, no future, only the present. Take away all of humanity's memories and the past doesn't exist at all.
There's also an understanding of time that says it only goes forward, making time travelling to the past impossible.
Well it's a good thing that the post does not say "bad at reading" then, isn't it