[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

I dunno how to tell you this but the Setting Money On Fire company isn’t losing money on account of it being a weirdo NPO structure…

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

yep I think so too. as I think I posted here a while back:

25068   + Oct 12 GitHub          ( 20K) Your free GitHub Copilot access is ending soon

and now suddenly it's Launched Again! but with limits. gotta whet those appetites just a bit more! sales will totes follow soon!

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

it is funny as fuck, though

on which note: I would love to see a kind of "double-blind" experience where a pile of (ideally, more clever/clueful) muskrats get to interact with felon (without knowing that they are), and then watch the fallout as they all go "wtf is this dumbass I'm speaking to"

I'm thinking something in the survivor-y format of shows

probably wouldn't ever happen, felon's too fucking proud (and would 10000000% rig the game to own image advantage). but in a perfect world where this happened, oh wouldn't that just be some great television

[-] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

yeah, which is rather lol

"please believe in meeeeeeeeeee"

afaik it's not illegal but I have a strong feeling that quite a number of Typical OpenAI Practices And Behaviours are going to inform what becomes anathema and what becomes illegal in the coming years, because ho boy

[-] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

love how they edited their comment to be "more specific" and just made it even worse

[-] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

to get on my developing-nation[0] soapbox for a little bit: it is, and it's also hilarious how often this sort of shit happens with things developed by people who you could largely handwave as "their smallest computer is a 3yo max-spec mbp" (I know this isn't precise but ygwim). "talk to your users" is obviously useful and it's often largely clear that a lot of these orgs don't, but it's even more clear in places further down the economic ladder. the one thing people in such markets often have is bucketloads of time. I do like that the phrasing used in the article was "you do not actually have to spend any money" rather than calling it "free" - this is still work. but you will readily find maaaaaany people who will do this sort of thing

[0] - speaking from experience, large consideration in stuff I have to design for in services

[-] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

SAP without SAP for those who think they want SAP who feel they can't afford SAP who'll end up paying SAP prices anyway, because no-one involved will just stop and think for a fucking moment

[-] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

I didn't even press Next Page! dire

[-] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

MSDSs are already dogshit

one of those cases of "minimum legally required" type of things? maybe with a dash of "the specification and requirements were written ${time} ago and haven't evolved a lick since then, despite much shift in industry and progress"?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

this isn't Oprah Ft Holographic Dr Phil, stop projecting

I merely looked after you went 3 for 3 on idiotic posts

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

“I was there for the stubsack” is also definitely something you can get on some niche shirts that very few would get

the best kind

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

nytpitchbot: first we had breadtube, now this ~~wingnut~~ thought leader wants to make people aware of breadsexuals

view more: ‹ prev next ›

froztbyte

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago