pray forgive, fair poster, for the shame I have cast upon myself in the action of doubting the Most Serious Article so affine to yourself - clearly a person of taste and wit, and I deserve the ire and muck resultant
wait... wait, no, sorry! got those the wrong way around. happens all the time - guess I tried too hard to think like you.
nothx, I can find better fiction on ao3
nah, not yet, imo. reasons: you overestimate how much & how many people care, and the complexities of doing such blocks well
I run the hosting of some small (by global standards) media setups and I've floated crawler defense there and had fairly little bite so far despite the issues the crawlers have caused. engagement brain is still extremely fucking prevalent
using it to source data in the meantime. I can tell you with absolute certainty that openai lies about its sourcing
you do know that you don’t have to be a pliant useful idiot like this, right? doing the free “open source” pr repetition (when it’s none of that)? shit’s more like shareware (if that at all - certainly doesn’t have the same spiritual roots as shareware. for them it’s some shit thrown over the wall to keep the rabble quiet)
(it’d be nice if we could popularise something like how kernel will go “tainted”, but unfortunately the entire fucking llm field is so we’d need a stronger word)
wow, thanks for that wonderfully personal and thought out contribution
what the fuck makes you think "let me, unasked, go pop some shit into a prompt, and then unload its response on someone who didn't ask for it" is at all something that's okay to do?
fucking moronic dickheads
apparently those qualcomm NPUs (the "AI assist" chips in the copilot(?) laptops) aren't very good
honestly, samesies
I'm kinda taken aback at how many people are popping in saying they have such things. at almost all usage times I can barely see my bloody wallpaper, too much else going on/present
give someone bad information in an unfamiliar shape and they won't immediately get upset, because they can't immediately see that it's bad
yet more obscurantist sleight of mouth by one of the ranking world liars
In [1]: for i in range(1, 5): print(f"{i*1000} days: {i*1000/365} years")
1000 days: 2.73972602739726 years
2000 days: 5.47945205479452 years
3000 days: 8.219178082191782 years
4000 days: 10.95890410958904 years
how many is a "few", 'ole sammy mah boi
and can you definitely find a way to set 6b+/year on fire (with growth for salaries and costs) for that long?
truly, the sfba business model is one of the most remarkable of the last 2 decades
new idea: get the morewrongers to work themselves up about "ontologically, is 'superhuman prediction' the same class as superintelligence?"
why? oh, y'know, just things:
Yeah.
I had parents that did this shit (and more). Emphasis on “had”: I walked the fuck away from the whole goddamn lot.
Does my fucking head in to see this kind of shit not only being given airtime but done so without criticism in the coverage.
every time I read these posters it's in that type of the Everyman characters in the discworld that say some utter lunatic shit and follow it up with "it's just [logical/natural/obvious/...]"