A recent trio of articles in Time Magazine has led to backlash in Taiwan, particularly seeing as the three articles frame current Taiwanese president Lai Ching-te as being dangerously pro-independence. The three articles are by thinktank analyst Lyle Goldstein, retired People’s Liberation Army senior colonel Zhou Bo, and Time editor Charlie Campbell.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, it never occurred to Time that a Taiwanese voice should be included in a discussion about Taiwan’s future, instead confining discussion solely to Westerners and Chinese nationals. This backlash against Taiwan proves ironic–the DPP has long been lambasted by foreign correspondents based in Taiwan for privileging Time Magazine above any other publication when it came to features, interviews, or profiles of heads of state. It is probable that the articles were released ahead of an upcoming meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in which the two will discuss Taiwan, in an attempt to influence Trump’s decision-making.
I do deradicalisation work with men I find IRL or online, I think there's a better way for men, but they're actively pyoped into voting and acting against their own interests.
Can't express how many of them (at least in my country) point to memes like this as "see, feminism just wants to shame men, it's not about equality, I'm gonna vote for (insert Christofascist that wants Handmaiden's Tale IRL) because he 'stands up for my rights'".
The creeps that you mention don't care that you're mean to them, they also can't be convinced to change their political stance, they're irrecoverable misogynists.
Unless you plan to form an armed paramilitary of radfems (which would be cool), I see yelling about "triggered men" as a pretty bad political strategy, because it alienates exactly the guys that are on the fence and could be convinced to abandon internalised misogyny and become feminists. Feminists already don't get triggered by this, creeps don't care.