charonn0

What's obvious is that my assessment is probably correct. The lawsuit will fail because the "actual point being made" is not a legal point but a political one. And certainly not a criminal point.

But we're discussing your disagreement with my assessment that "charge" is willfully dishonest.

Just... wow.

It's a civil case.

A civil case is a private, non-criminal lawsuit, usually involving private property rights, including respecting rights stated under the Constitution or under federal or state law.

Which is also why it's doomed to fail.

He was not.

Just recently I was reading about blind people who got experimental eye implants several years ago. They're having serious problems now because the company stopped supporting the implants.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/bionic-eye-obsolete

Only certain specific reasons can actually disqualify a candidate. For example, age, naturalization, or fomenting an insurrection after having sworn an oath to the US.

The use of the word "charged" here is willfully dishonest.

Tenants don't have the same rights with respect to their landlord as employees do with their employer. So unfortunately I can't see this ending well for the tenants who participate.

The idea of checks and balances on the exercise of government powers extends to even the state/federal relationship.

Cybersecurity != Safety Critical