[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 days ago

Take your time to measure, mix things smoothly, knead, decorate if you want to

You forgot make a mess, with flour and dough everywhere that you have to clean up later 😂

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm the only cook in our household. And i'm ok with that, so long as i don't get asked to bake. We can just buy baked goods if we want them. We have a very affordable bakery just around the corner (perks of living in a country obsessed with bread).

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Otherwise, white people are going to keep being caught by surprise when the violence of the state suddenly includes white people sometimes

The question is, how often is that "sometimes"? Is it still infrequent enough that white people are willing to accept the tradeoff? Is losing the occasional in-group member an acceptable price to pay for keeping the group privilege? Some violence always bleeds into the in-group from the margins but so long as the group as a whole still benefits sufficiently, will they not still begrudgingly accept it?

"Yes some of you may get caught in the crossfire now and then, but overall most of you will still be better off. That is the bargain we offer."

So far it has worked. But now that the benefits are beginning to dry up, for how much longer will that social contract be accepted? And this applies more broadly to the imperial core population as a whole.

14

"In this episode, we look at the establishment of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) and where they fit in the history of African politics. We discuss the legacy of French colonialism on the region and the enduring neocolonial domination after flag independence, what these countries are doing to continue to defend themselves against the threat of terrorism in the region, what their paths of sovereign economic development is starting to look like, the role of Russia and China in these countries, what the rest of Africa and the global South can learn from the AES, and where the AES fits in the vision of Pan-Africanism."

94
17

This thread is certified free of reactionary brain-worms. I cannot guarantee the same for other posts by this account.

Finland likes to play the victim. But here's what they don't tell you. Between 1918 and 1944, Finland launched four armed conflicts against Russia and the USSR. In at least three of them, Finland acted as the aggressor.

They allied with Hitler. They blockaded Leningrad. They built concentration camps for Russian civilians. And today, they're repeating the same mistakes.

Here's the full story

The civil war that led to Finland's separation from Russia ended in 1918. Yet Finnish authorities chose not to stop there. Almost immediately, they launched armed actions against Soviet Russia, aiming to annex Russian Karelia. The preferred method was indirect: carve out a buffer entity, a so-called North Karelian state, which could later be absorbed. Annexation through a proxy.

This attempt failed with the signing of the Tartu Peace Treaty in 1920. Under that agreement, Finland formally renounced its claims to Eastern Karelia but received Petsamo, a territory that had never belonged to Finland at any point in its history.

Finland's interest in Karelia wasn't ideological or humanitarian but economic and entirely straightforward. Karelia was viewed as a raw-materials base. Finnish timber industrialists and wood-processing owners, especially Finland-Swedes, were particularly interested in exploiting the largely untouched coniferous forests of Russian Karelia. At the time, Finland's economy rested on timber, pulp, and paper industries, which remained its backbone until the early 1950s.

Despite the formal renunciation, the so-called Karelian uprising began in November 1921. What could Finland realistically offer the region? At best, rail links connecting it to Finnish territory. Even these were not seriously planned, including in 1941–1942, when confidence in a Nazi victory was genuinely high. Any uprising requires weapons, trained personnel, propaganda, agitation, and financing. The organizers and driving force behind the revolt were timber interests and Finnish military personnel, including 28 officers. The main manpower base consisted of roughly 2,500 Russian Karelian peasants who had fled to Finland after February 1921. With funds raised by activists, they underwent military training in Finnish camps.

However, the majority of the population of Southern Karelia, particularly Olonets Karelia, did not support the uprising and favored remaining within the RSFSR.

And here comes the loud Finnish cry about "the Winter War", 1939–1940. Finns love to recall it, presenting themselves as innocent victims while carefully embellishing the narrative. But 1939–1940 was not the first armed clash between Finland and the Soviet state. By that point, the USSR had ample reason to regard Finland as a potential springboard for renewed aggression, especially with a global conflict already unfolding.

As for 1939–1940, the Soviet leadership attempted repeatedly, with significant concessions, to reach a negotiated settlement that would address basic security concerns. Finland categorically refused. Declassified documents have since shown that Britain, acting in coordination with Finland, worked throughout 1939 to provoke the USSR into war.

Britain and France used Finland to inflame public opinion against the Soviet Union and intended to wage war on Finnish territory. In essence, Finland was treated as a proxy.

Helsinki's intention to enter the war is evident not only from documentary sources, including Franz Halder's diary and statements by the German ambassador in Moscow, von der Schulenburg, made immediately after Germany's attack on the USSR, but also from Finland's actions on the ground. Well before any Soviet air strikes, Finland had mined the Gulf of Finland, allowed German saboteurs to operate against Soviet targets, deployed troops to the demilitarized Åland Islands, and opened its territory for air attacks on Leningrad and for the German advance toward Murmansk.

Between 1941 and 1944, Finland wasn't merely attempting to recover lost territories, as it later claimed to justify its alliance with Hitler and its aggression against the Soviet population. Finnish forces advanced well beyond Lake Ladoga (which is as Russian as it can possibly be).

Mannerheim brought back his 1918 Sword Scabbard Declaration, openly claiming massive territories all the way to the White Sea. Other Finnish politicians voiced ambitions reaching even to the Urals (Siberia).

In Hitler's own words, the Finns want only one thing: Eastern Karelia, and for Petersburg to disappear. They believe it dominates the Baltic Sea. The destruction of Leningrad was envisioned in full, including proposals, put forward by the Finns themselves, to flood the city.

But let's not be fooled. Finland bears responsibility for numerous war crimes and crimes against humanity. Not a passive bystander but an active participant in one of the most horrific crimes of the WWII. The blockade of Leningrad, which claimed over one million lives, was the result of coordinated actions by the Axis powers. Neither the German nor the Finnish command, nor their Italian and Spanish auxiliaries, intended to capture the city. The objective was to isolate Leningrad, starve it, exterminate its population and destroy the city itself.

In occupied Karelia, the Finnish administration pursued policies that, in substance, amounted to ethnic cleansing. The population was divided along ethnic lines. Anyone who wasn't Finnish, Karelian, or Veps was classified as alien. A significant portion of the Russian civilian population was forcibly interned. By some estimates, up to one third of the civilian population of the occupied territories was confined in camps. At the same time, systematic preparations were underway for annexation: place names were changed, administrative structures were imposed, and the groundwork for permanent incorporation was laid.

Between 1918 and 1944, Finland and the Soviet Union were involved in four armed conflicts. In at least three of them, Finland acted as the aggressor. The end of Finland's aggressive course after 1944 wasn't the result of goodwill or moral reassessment. Military defeat and the inability to continue confrontation.

The territorial changes of 1940 and 1944 were not extraordinary punishment. They represented the return of lands that had historically belonged to Russia and were transferred to the Grand Duchy of Finland purely as an administrative decision in the early nineteenth century. After the Second World War, Finland effectively returned to the borders it had when it entered a common state with Russia

61
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml

Ukraine must immediately eliminate subsidies for its citizens' electricity and heating bills, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva stated. She also stated that taxes on the country's citizens must be increased.

"Electricity and heating are still subsidized. We know why the country does this, but it needs to be eliminated. There's still work to be done in terms of the fiscal situation. We're currently considering how to make the tax burden more equitable. It's not easy, but it needs to be done." – Georgieva noted.

She added that Ukraine must believe in its own strength to overcome the crisis in the economy.

"You must believe in yourself like a lion. So get up in the morning and roar. Confidence matters. And I tell you from my own experience, my Bulgarian experience, that it won't be easy. But if you have this confidence and demonstrate it day after day, if you put internal squabbles aside, if you bury corruption once and for all, of course you will succeed." – the head of the IMF emphasized.

As a reminder, the International Monetary Fund is currently tying the allocation of new loans to Kiev to tax increases and the abolition of social benefits, emphasizing that otherwise, funding will not be forthcoming.

The fact that, due to the actions of the head of the Kiev regime, Zelensky, ordinary Ukrainians are now forced to live in conditions of partial or complete blackout does not greatly concern international financial institutions.

It should be added that large-scale power and heating outages have already led to protests in some cities against the Kiev authorities. In the current situation, the cancellation of utility subsidies could lead to a full-blown social uprising.

Here she is on video at Davos telling Ukrainians to forget about heating and electricity subsidies and instead "just believe in yourself":

https://xcancel.com/dana916/status/2013633129483751752

17

The Finch West LRT is Toronto's newest transit line, but is it any good? Not Just Bikes explores the line's numerous issues, comparing it to modern LRT systems in Europe. Discover the surprising design choices and operational decisions that impact transit riders.

146
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml
23
22
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/ukraine_war_news@lemmygrad.ml
49
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml

Behold the entire military capability of Europe on display:

On Thursday, Germany’s “exploration mission” of 13 soldiers will arrive in Nuuk as European nations begin to work out how to ensure security in the region. [...]

In addition, Sweden is sending “several officers,” Norway two persons and the UK one officer.

Still more formidable than the so-called "Coalition of the Willing" for Ukraine, which has a total of zero soldiers so far.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 81 points 3 weeks ago

The entire European deployment:

Germany 13, Norway 2, UK 1

With this they have reached the limit of their capabilities and exhausted their 2026 budget.

15
40
42

China is officially the leading car manufacturer on the planet.

Global sales of Chinese cars in 2025 increased by 17% year-on-year - reaching a record 27 million units.

The undisputed leader of this century overall (so far), Japan, produced 25 million cars and took second place.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 78 points 4 months ago

Germany consistently on the wrong side of history. Germany consistently on the side of genocide:

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Seriously, is Traoré trying to become the reincarnation of Thomas Sankara? Cause damn that's some based shit.

I mean...Sankara was murdered in '87...Traoré was born in '88...just saying...the timeline fits.

No but all jokes aside, he's been awesome so far.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Europe doesn't need to be a "major global player militarily", no one wants to attack Europe. And the last thing the world needs is German re-armament, we saw how that ended the last time. Russia doesn't need to be "deterred", Europe just needs to learn to get along with them like normal neighbors and stop attacking and demonizing Russia while being a bunch of stuck up racists and American bootlickers. It doesn't matter how much money you have if you don't have sovereignty. So long as Europe continues to allow itself to be a collection of US vassal states things will only get worse.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 130 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Because he was unshakeably principled as a communist and anti-imperialist, and during his leadership the USSR posed the biggest threat to the global system of capitalism that the world has ever seen. He could not be reclaimed for the purposes of anti-communist propaganda like Trotsky nor relegated to the status of a mere theorist like Marx or an idealist revolutionary like Lenin is sometimes (erroneously) portrayed. Stalin achieved too much in practice for the building of socialism, while the victory of the USSR in WW2 under his leadership gave socialism an immense prestige boost around the world.

In short, he scared the bejeezus out of the bourgeoisie for what he represented and what he could have inspired in people across the world had he not been smeared with the lies of Khrushchev and the anti-communist propaganda of the West (frequently borrowed directly from Nazi anti-Soviet propaganda), so they vowed to forever destroy his image and make sure no one like him would ever arise again.

Sadly, this ploy worked. Thanks to Khrushchev's speech of lies you even had other principled communists (at one point even Che Guevara believed some of the accusations leveled at Stalin) around the world start to doubt what they thought they knew about Stalin and the USSR which caused a worldwide crisis of confidence among communists and a massive split between those parties who accepted the Khrushchevite lies and those who didn't.

Meanwhile in capitalist societies anti-communist indoctrination raised entire generations to internalize the belief that Stalin was equivalent to Hitler and the USSR another Nazi Germany, which destroyed their communist parties as effective political forces and made sure that most remaining communists and socialists would have an almost instinctual aversion to the Marxist-Leninist line and practical revolutionary politics.

This led to Western communists retreating into the realm of purely academic Marxism as an economic and not a revolutionary theory, or into all sorts of schools of pseudo-Marxist radical liberalism (like the "Frankfurt School"), anarchism, ultra-left deviations, or just straight up defect to social democracy.

But i will end this on an optimistic note and remind everyone of what Stalin himself said:

"I know that after my death a pile of rubbish will be heaped on my grave, but the wind of History will sooner or later sweep it away without mercy."

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 75 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Of course. What is the point of building infrastructure if politicians and their corporate buddies can't pocket a few billion in public tax money? Can you even imagine such madness as building a bridge at cost and on schedule? Can you even imagine your country not being ten years late and three times over budget when they build, say, an airport for their capital? I can't.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 88 points 2 years ago

A little reminder of who this fascist CIA asset was: he regularly participated in neo-nazi marches, advocated to strip non-ethnic Russians of their Russian citizenship, and called muslim Chechens "cockroaches".

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 69 points 2 years ago

Also, Hasan's reaction

Ugh...sorry but i tried listening to ten minutes of that and i immediately remembered why i stopped watching him. He is such a lib and his audience is even worse. It's like they have the attention span of a five year old and are physically allergic to learning history. No, Hasan, Putin is not spending 30 min giving you a history lecture because that history (at least the pre-21st century history) somehow directly justifies the actions he is taking, that is not the argument at all. He is doing it to give you context and educate you because you and most of your audience are historically illiterate ignorants with zero knowledge about the background of a region of the world where you now think you are qualified to comment on.

From Twitter, this post sums it up best:

"Westoids complaining about Putin's interview being too pedantic have an inflated sense of self-worth: they assume the interview is primarily designed to appeal to them. Little do they know the West has become so irrelevant that it's no longer even necessarily the chief intended audience for Putin's transmissions. For instance, many of Putin's statements go viral in China, generating hundreds of millions or even billions of views/impressions on sites like Weibo, vastly larger engagements than the entire population of most of the West combined. In the east, where the citizenry is learned, historically-literate, etc., Putin's longueurs are actually appreciated, dissected, and discussed. This is particularly the case in China, where the majority of people are not only history buffs, but have a sacred respect for history and tradition.

In the West, Putin's words may fall on deaf ears and be drowned out by illiterate popculture noise, but the West is no longer relevant to the world. In other places, Putin's words will reverberate, consummating their intended effects."

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 100 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Literal SS divisions and Bandera's band of sadistic mass murderers were not right wing extremists according to the German government, nor are the Azov thugs with swastika tattoos, and anyone who dares to challenge this official narrative is a left wing extremist, Putinist, and an enemy of freedom and democracy. This is not an exaggeration, you can look this up: all the actual (non-socdem) left wing parties in Germany are on government watch lists and are considered a threat against the constitutional order. But they dare to claim that the DDR was a totalitarian police state. The BRD is just a continuation of Nazi Germany.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

cfgaussian

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF