15

A fantasy world, in which social web, semantic web, agentic web and world wide web all co-exist, with competing factions for each web paradigm (Fedi Tribes - Decentral social networks, Inference Nomads - Semantic Web Technology/Declarative Programming, Fungi Nation - Machine Learning and Marble Kingdom - Incremental Programming/Web Technology).

8

Attempt of an allegory of our digital present. It is set in a world, in which algorithms and neuronal networks are not abstract ideas but physical entities. Hopefully, this can better explain the technology, their relationship to society and their historical context. The goal is that the underlying mechanics of the world function like a consistent framework of the digital, in which digital entities can be build; a literary sandbox like Minecraft or LEGO but for the digital.

-5
Webtale (philpapers.org)
submitted 3 months ago by blue_berry@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/38336335

Four different factions live together in fantasy world that is awfully similar to other today's web ...

-2
submitted 3 months ago by blue_berry@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/38336277

What if in 1989, Tim Berners Lee invented the semantic web instead of the world wide web?

-3

What if in 1989, Tim Berners Lee invented the semantic web instead of the world wide web?

-10

Prequel and Sequel to "Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality", bridging first into a medieval setting in which the magic system works like incremental programming and then into the present day, in which it works like logical programming. Philosophically, the medieval setting is post-modernism and the present day is analytic philosophy, while HPATMOR is enlightenment rationalism. It's a bit like a digital Alice in wonderland.

11
13
20
6
submitted 5 months ago by blue_berry@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
8
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by blue_berry@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
5
submitted 5 months ago by blue_berry@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

Why do official clerks not have the equivalent of a calculator like engineers do but for inference? The fundamental idea of this paper is for ChatGPT-like apps to lose natural language for less energy consumption and more determinism in their answers based on controlled natural languages like ACE; and to capture this new paradigm in a new type of browser that has natural language as its primary interface, here called a semantic web-first browser. The idea is proposed in several design steps, beginning with a simple to use calculator-like program to do inference with natural language (pocket-inferer), for which, when a programmer-mode is turned on, transforms into an IDE-like ACE-editor. The idea is then further developed into a semantic web browser, which can also reference data and queries from the semantic web and later, it is philosphised how a web-paradigm agnostic SemanticWebBrowser could be realized.

This poses a fundamental anthesis to ChatGPT-like apps and LLM-centered visions for the WWW with the biggest merit being to tradeoff natural language for more precision and less energy-consumption through controlled natural language. The five main points this paper makes are:

    1. AI browsers with their high energy consumption are not suitable for daily usage (not in the near future, if ever).
    1. There has not yet been found a sufficient interface for the semantic web to be appealing to end-users and reach wider adoption
    1. Controlled natural language like ACE could serve well as a main interface for semantic data, because they manage to capture the potential of semantic web data better than any visualization ever could
    1. The best application for this approach would be a new kind of browser, which realizes “language as an interface” for the semantic web
    1. Derived from language as the main interface, the browser needs to center around the interaction with language and therefore look like a text editor or IDE.
    1. While showing the merits of the semantic web, the browser should also be “backwards compatible” with the traditional world wide web.

It is largely based on the following work: Kaarel Kaljurand. “Attempto Controlled English as a Semantic Web Language” (2007).

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

What aren't they joining Mastodon and Lemmy? Or even Threads?

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think multi-communities (which have already been improved for funding) will push Lemmy forward big time. https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/818

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I think its a cool idea. I had a similar idea once: https://fungiverse.wordpress.com/2024/07/27/floo-network-anouncement/ but for the whole social web instead of just Lemmy.

Its interesting, it could get overwhelming easily though. Maybe this could be solved by only showing instances of a certain size?

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago

Even if it doesnt have much impact on activitypub-fedi, I think this is good news for the fediverse in general. X is loosing more and more relevancy and microblogging is more and more happening on federating services.

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You can already see how Meta will also use imagery to establish its centre-position in the Fediverse with its symbol for the Fediverse (it has a centre):

(from https://mastodon.social/@liaizon@wake.st/112139602260820054)

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

It’s fine if single instances do consent-based federation that prioritize safety over openess, but why should it become the default for all instances? It will result in instance protectionism and an overall decline in discussion quality. Making it opt-in means people will connect less likely with folks from other instances, meaning people will mainly stay on their instances, meaning it supports tribalism in the Fediverse. More safety usually comes at a cost, too. In this case: less interaction with other instances.

But if you federate with instances that you trust good enough in the first place, constent-based federation is not necessary imo.

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I have to switch between subscribed/local/all feed all the time. That's why I proposed a mixed-feed, which merges Subscribed/Local/All feed according to users settings so you don't have to switch all the time.

I already created an issue: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/2137

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Just looked up what FANG means - what the hell does Netflix in there? Seriously Netflix doesn't do shit. Typical case of forced acronyms ;)

Without the fediverse a viable non-surveilled internet might not be able to exist.

I would agree. Mastodon made search opt-in. There will always be communities and users that refuse to be searchable and that should be fine.

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I meant stories you experienced when using corp-owned social networks

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Me too but we are also on lemmy.world which is well moderated (and I think also has the resources to do so)

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think this is also heavily related to the CSAM issue, because

A.) Its horrible to read about in the first place B.) Its makes users more reluctant to browse content in general C.) It makes users more reluctant to browse content at work or in public places

I think that scared off many users (it also scared me off a bit). I think if Lemmy finds a solution to fight this kind of stuff and gives users some reassurance that the problem is handled will bring many users back. I think the importance of content moderation and SPAM defense should be the biggest learning points of the first Lemmy loop.

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Thanks! I did that also because sometimes these technicalities change (at least the not underlying ones). For example in many graphics you have still Twitter but its now X.

view more: next ›

blue_berry

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago