Stalin is always on point, but the tweet you linked uses the word "globalist" which we should all recognize as a potential sign of anti-semitic conspiracy theory nonsense. it did not take long scrolling through their account to find this retweeted from Jackson Hinkle.

the fact that you copied their entire tweet except the sentence that has globalist in it suggests to me that you know this.

https://youtu.be/CduA0TULnow

have you met many quants? a large number of them are like that, in much the same way that crypto currency people are (in fact, i think the crypto people are like that because they are poorly copying the quants).

usually the bits here are somewhat over the top, but this is a very modest proposal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ana_Navarro

the lead dev has gone on the record that using singular they in the documentation is putting politics into his project, so i expect it to be possibly technically interesting (emphasis on possibly), but no effort put into accessibility and with a fucking horrendous dev community.

i think the way they want it to be understood is "if elected, i will so thoroughly address all of the issues you care about that you don't have to vote on them again", which is kind of reasonable until you try working out how that would happen

nah, that's a load bearing personal fantasy. once you put it in, it's never coming out.

so, start with:

x = 0.999...

now multiply each side by 10

10x = 9.9999....

now we subtract x from the left side, and 0.999... from the right, which is fine because they are equal:

9x = 9

and from there it should be fairly obvious that x is also equal to 1, which means 0.999... is also equal to 1

i was almost following until i hit guyana

this is only barely a story. i have very little confidence in western news reporting on anonymous sources out of china. i am very willing to believe that this official is getting removed because of the backlash to this, as china does have a reputation for having actual consequences to fucking up their economy, but anything beyond "we aren't going to do the regulations exactly like that" is completely unfounded speculation

i wouldn't date a lib, but i'm dating an anarchist right now. as i talk to her more about stuff, i think once she works through some of her issues, she'll come around to the ML side a bit more.