So let me get this right? they got a bunch of {1,2,3,4}^2 points and they applied k-means one (1) time with the standard l_2 metric, found 4 random ass centroids, published it, and now you're calling into question their methodology?

edit: The problem with k means is that it converges to local minima, so depending on the starting point (in this case the 4 'typologies') each run gives different results. So any typologies found are gonna be interpreted with the ideological slant of the authors. Also a heat map would have been better for representing the data: it's on a 2d grid.

put it in some sandwiches

Pues sí, pero el cruce entre PoBRe eS pObrE pORke KiERe y El Secreto casi me deja inconsciente.

Posting here before I get any capsaicin resistant

POWERFUL POSTING

You'll have to coax their definition out sentence by sentence and piece it together.

who's the chud?

El Vende-Huérfanos

I'm gonna say, wrong.

WRONG!

Like, don't get caught, or go to jail, or whatever, but yeah you should trying to do things that will bring harm to your enemies.

fed shit? you probably headed to lunch late over at Langley.

Just let it go. I'm not a great example of this, but don't hold grudges against idiots that endanger others for the sake of getting that last word in. That revenge shit, it's not in our hands. Also, the liberal driller is still out and about.

I'm sorry that happened to you and I hope that asshole gets got