This is just the "Achilles and the turtle" paradox again, isn't it? You won't trick me into inventing calculus a second time!
Meanwhile, many millions of years ago:

Hängt halt von der Definition ab. Afrika ist wie erwähnt halt auch noch Teil "Afroeurasiens", und da eine Grenze durch Ägypten zu ziehen, weil "ist ja wirklich schmall die Verbindung", ist halt genauso willkürlich wie Europa nicht von Asien zu trennen, oder Sylt von Eurasien.
Europa ist ein Kontinent, oder Erdteil, weil die meisten Leute das über die im Artikel genannte Geschichte definieren.
Wenn jemand im politischen Raum sagt, es sei "einfach zu schwierig" oder gar "unmöglich", Überreiche zu besteuern, müsst ihr in Gedanken bitte ergänzen: "... und deshalb besteuern wir lieber Dich, Du Opfer!"
-- Awet Tesfaiesus, MdB
This isn't even a tariffs issue... well, maybe not, anyway. The same thing happened in Germany at least.
Over here, the reason potatoes are literally being given out for free is that the potato harvest was so bountiful, the supply so high, that the price distributors and supermarkets pay for them was just not worth the effort for a lot of farms. We literally produced too many potatoes for Capitalism to handle. I heard onions were similarly high in supply, so they were literally sold as biomass for energy production.
Remember this when you see someone begging for food. We could feed them, but if we can't profit of it we won't.
Wtf, only 30% of the minimum wage for being 15? What exactly is the company supposed to do with the other 70% to justify that?
The article states that the "Intelligent Speed Assistance devices" are supposed to prevent drivers from driving more than 5 mph over the speed limit. So I'm fairly certain GPS and/or Road Sign Information systems will be used.
GPS Data. Most dedicated navigation systems have the speed limit data in their maps for the last decade or so. They're probably also going to add the Road sign information systems that newer cars have.
And a car that cannot speed can? You might not have thought that one through.
If only the "tax the rich" petition had such a great villain to reinvigorate interest, but I take what I can get.
we’ve decided to waive our right to arbitration
That's legalese for "We still think that we have that right, we will use it again".
Tudsamfa
0 post score0 comment score
If the number of passengers is unknown, we can't guarantee it is strictly positive or even an integer.
Sure, accidentally killing lim {-2,-1,-2,-1...} people is good compared to lim {4,2,1,...} or 5, but only if it's an integer that's a 50/50 on being negative. If it's not an integer, which is infinitely more likely if we truly have nothing to go off and have to assume it was randomly chosen, then reality might break upon reaching the station.