TerranFenrir

Naah for some reason I find it incredibly disgusting. Instead, I scream till it gets out.

I'm not. Nicole never messaged me :(

Aww you're always posting cute stuff like this on Lemmy. Keep up the cuteness haha!

You got me for 0.4201 seconds

1. If the civilization that discovers it is more advanced than 20th century humanity, then no. They would know their purpose.
2. If it's not as technologically advanced, the it's possible I suppose

Same test for comment:

Markdowned link

Naked link: https://youtube.com/

https://youtube.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2G5IR9gAqI

Nah they'll say "your the dumb fuck"

Are you really Obamna?

Test

Nono no need to LIVE on the moon. Living in microgravity is bad for health. Living in rotating space habitats is the only realistic way we get space cities.

But yes, the moon definitely has the advantage of no atmosphere. Basically, the moon is where we place our industries (for the orbital and interplanetary economies).

NOOOOOO not fairrrrr

Mars is so incredibly useless from the point of view of advancing civilization.

We can do so much stuff on the moon a lot better than on Mars. In short, the moon is MEANT to be industrialised by us.

Here's a video, cuz I'm too lazy to type out everything. Also, sorry for the YouTube link. I don't think this fellow uploads anywhere else.

Also don't get me wrong. Mars is really cool as a scientific curiosity. It's just not suitable for advancing civilization yet.