Look, in the interest of bipartisanship...
No way. That's amazing. You should be proud @[email protected].
I think this is another interesting answer to the thread you linked to.
I’m not sure what people mean when they say it. IMO fascism is one of the potential outcomes of long or deep crisis in capitalism. We are seeing fascism rise around the world again because neoliberalism never really figured out how to resolve social, economic and geopolitical issues that began with the last recession and were probably exhasterbated by the pandemic.
If it means “fascism is aggressive capitalism” or “capitalism always becomes fascism” or that “fascism is simply a trick of the capitalist ruling class” then I agree, it’s a bad and incorrect argument. I don’t think it’s necessarily incorrect as there is a link between fascism and capitalism during economic or hegemonic crisis… I just think the phrase isn’t clarifying and like you imply it seems only as a rhetorical tool to make the link between capitalism and fascism. I’ve been using a slightly more specific version that “fascism is an illiberal attempt to contain capitalist class struggle within the nation-state.” I think that makes the link to fascism and crisis in capitalism without implying some deterministic historical formula of fascism means the fall of capitalism is at hand.
This 1920s report by Clara Zetkin is one of the early attempts by socialists to understand fascism as a distinct thing - also predates any liberal or mainstream analysis which didn’t really start happening until after WWII. It’s from 1923 so lacks a lot of our hindsight and she thought the movement was so incoherent that it would fall apart from internal differences… but reports about early Mussolini are kind of eerie at the movement in terms of echos and parallels to some contemporary counties. She does call it a sign of “decay” or something like that so maybe this is the origin of that meme version of “fascism is capitalism in decay”.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/zetkin/1923/06/fascism-report-comintern.htm
The Democratic Party is less popular than it's ever been, but surely this will save them.
Look, the primaries are the time to complain. And if they are rigged or don't even happen, then still don't complain, you just needed more votes. And if they still win the primary, then no I'm not endorsing them unless they believe what I believe.
It's like they believe in democratic centralism, but only when they are in charge lol.
Right? Did we just forget about the the actual politicians that got shot in Minnesota just a couple months ago, who's special election to replace their seat was just yesterday? Or the guy who entered Nancy Pelosi's house with a hammer to beat her to death and went for her husband? Or the shooting with Gabby Giffords? Or hell, the Evergreen High School shooting, which happened at the same time and seems to be by some kid radicalized by some extremist network, probably on the right considering how little details they've released.
None of those merit taking down Fox itself and every conservative news source and political commentator? But this merits the opposite, because Charlie Kirk was oh so important?
So far, the biggest detriment I see to organizing the left in the US in a socialist manner is foreign policy. It seems really hard to get US people to understand it. It takes way too much reading of news and knowledge of history. Not to mention, being in the imperial core, US foreign policy mostly benefits them.
Generally the commies I meet think he did some good things, did some bad things, made plenty of mistakes but wasn't as bad as the US painted him. He wasn't as bad as the Nazis. He had a cult of personality around him, sure, but it's not something he himself seemed to encourage, and he wasn't the dictator the US painted him as with absolute power.
At least that's what I've read on here before.
Vermont made it in. They just didn't make it in time for the press announcement apparently lol.
Last time they did that it caused a civil war, so, you know... Here's hoping lol.
They were shooting at Democrats before. Weren't two Minnesota state law makers shot in their home extremely recently?
That's partially why this makes me so insane. They're acting like this is the first political violence that's ever happened in this country. Violence is already happening, it was just always going one way before. They're just flipping their lid because it was a chud shot for once, and they can't believe it. I wonder how many libs this whole fiasco will jokerfy.
Its like watching Israel go insane every time a single soldier loses their life or a hostage is taken, when they kill Palestinians by the thousands.
SevenSkalls
0 post score0 comment score
What is this? Are these real?