cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/19430

The Senate is taking up a spending package passed by the House of Representatives that would cut $125 million in funding promised this year to replace toxic lead pipes.

Including three of 12 appropriations bills, this package will fund parts of the federal government, including the Environmental Protection Agency. The Senate is slated to vote on it later this week. Near the end of more than 400 pages of text, it proposes repurposing some funds previously obligated by the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, also known as the bipartisan infrastructure law.

That law, advanced by the Biden administration, promised $15 billion over five years to fund the replacement of service lines — pipes routing water into people’s homes and other buildings — that are made of or contain lead, a neurotoxin that can cause cognitive, developmental, reproductive, and cardiovascular harm.

The EPA released 2025 funding allocations in November, months late, obligating nearly $3 billion across the country. Illinois, the state with the most lead pipes in the nation, received the largest share. Another $3 billion was slated to be disbursed this year, the last for the funds.

The slashed $125 million would be repurposed for wildland fire management. Safe drinking water advocates and some lawmakers have called for the funds to be restored, calling them critical for health and safety. Because lead pipes are a public health hazard, the EPA has mandated that all states replace them within about a decade, with some extensions for states with many pipes, like Illinois.

“We are facing a water crisis, and I’m disappointed that money appropriated by the [Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act] for lead pipe replacement is being repurposed by this legislation,” Representative Debbie Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, said in a statement to Inside Climate News. “Every American deserves clean water, and we will not stop fighting until we get the lead out.”

The EPA declined to comment on pending legislation, but a spokesperson wrote in an email that the Trump EPA’s work on drinking water is “unmatched,” and said that funding from the agency will “accelerate progress in finding and removing lead pipes that deliver water to homes, schools, and businesses.”

President Donald Trump previously sought to almost completely eliminate a key funding source for drinking water, but the House rejected that proposal, and also refused to cut as much of the EPA’s budget as Trump wanted.

An earlier draft of the bill proposed cutting $250 million in lead pipe replacement funding, and House Democrats fought to protect the funds. In December, Dingell and Representative Rashida Tlaib, who is also a Democrat from Michigan, coordinated a letter to Senate leaders signed by 43 other members of Congress, arguing that the funding is critical for public health.

“Too often, our local communities do not have the resources and capacity to address this health risk without a more aggressive funding approach to this growing crisis,” the letter reads.

Julian Gonzalez, senior legislative counsel at Earthjustice, said the smaller cut is an improvement, but described it as “bittersweet.”

“It’s great that they were able to save $125 million from one version of the appropriations bill to the next, and it’s obviously really unfortunate and disappointing that there’s any clawback at all of these funds,” Gonzalez said.

The cost of replacement varies, but $125 million would pay for thousands of new lines. Any reduction in funding will have a material impact on people’s lives, Gonzalez added.

“If you just think about it as neighborhoods and families, then it becomes evident that it’s actually an enormous deal,” he said.

Mary Grant, water program director at Food & Water Watch, said communities burdened by lead pipes need “every dollar of federal support” to replace the toxic lines.

“I don’t think there is a real justification for cutting back lead service line funding,” Grant said. “At the end of the day, no matter where you live, no matter which party you vote for, everyone wants safe, lead-free water.”

There are millions of lead service lines across the country, and replacing them is an expensive job, with estimates ranging from $45 billion to $90 billion. Cuts to federal funding will likely impact cities with high numbers of pipes, like Chicago, most severely, Grant said. Officials in Illinois have already called for greater financial support from the federal government to replace its hundreds of thousands of lead-containing lines.

The EPA estimated in 2024 that there were about 9 million lead service lines nationwide, but late last year the agency revised its estimate to 4 million. Drinking water advocates have criticized the new methodology, which estimates that the vast majority of the 24 million service lines of unknown material don’t contain lead — a far greater proportion than previous estimates.

In an emailed statement, an EPA spokesperson defended the new methodology and said the critiques are “simply wrong.” The new estimate involves “significantly more robust” data than the previous numbers, the agency statement said, given that all states were required to submit inventories of their service line materials in 2024.

“The EPA’s reduced number of presumed lead service lines may also be a precursor to future efforts to justify cuts in funding for replacement of these lead pipes,” wrote Erik D. Olson, the Natural Resources Defense Council’s senior strategic director for environmental health, in December. “This is penny-wise and pound-foolish, since the health and economic benefits of removing these lead pipes are more than 14 times the costs. And it does not bode well for the tens of millions of Americans who continue to drink lead-contaminated water from these lead pipes.”

This story was originally published by Grist with the headline States say they need more help replacing lead pipes. Congress may cut the funding instead. on Jan 13, 2026.

From Grist via This RSS Feed.

Mamdani stays mum as Tisch defends NYPD gang database during joint appearance

Mayor Zohran Mamdani stood beside NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch at their first joint press conference this week and was silent as she defended the department’s gang database.

Before becoming mayor, Mamdani was clear in his opposition to the database, calling it a “vast dragnet” that punished young New Yorkers of color with only loose connections to gang activity.

But on Tuesday, Mamdani didn’t say a word.

The moment underscored a growing question for the city’s new progressive mayor: Will he follow through on his campaign promise to dismantle the database or quietly let it stand?

Civil rights groups and their allies in the City Council are pressuring him to act. Critics have equated the database with racial profiling. But with a federal civil rights lawsuit underway over the database, and top police officials calling the tracker essential to public safety, Mamdani faces a high-stakes choice that could define his relationship with the NYPD and the city’s broader approach to crime and surveillance.

When asked about the tracker on Tuesday, Tisch defended it as critical.

"I have been very clear that the gang database is a tool that has helped us in terms of fighting gun violence," Tisch said.

While campaigning for mayor, Mamdani supported City Council legislation to abolish the database as a counterproductive measure that ensnares young people who may not be involved in criminal activity.

"Whether they go out late, photos they put on social media — so much of the facts of life of being a young New Yorker, and yet it then becomes a mark of suspicion," he said in September.

What is the gang database?

The NYPD's "Criminal Groups Database" contains information on thousands of people police believe are either gang members or associates.

According to the city's Department of Investigation, an estimated 10,000 officers have in-depth access to their profiles that include names, alleged gang affiliations, criminal justice histories and the criteria that led to their inclusion, such as locations associated with groups.

Ninety-eight percent of those listed are Black or Hispanic, and most are men between 18 and 34, according to a 2023 watchdog report, the last available review of the database. The audit said the database included 1,689 minors.

After programming errors were discovered during a DOI audit, the tracker shrank by nearly 40%, dropping from 13,989 people in June 2024 to 8,563 in October 2025.

Why is it controversial?

Critics say the database unfairly targets people of color based on factors unrelated to criminal activity, like the music they listen to or their social acquaintances. Civil rights advocates have argued that it’s used to surveil non-white New Yorkers without transparency or due process.

The NYPD says the database helps prevent shootings. But to Dana Rachlin — founder of We Build The Block, a community group focused on public safety through violence reduction and youth support — it’s a list of kids who need help.

Rachlin said police aren't equipped to address the root causes of gang violence.

"They did not go to school to be social workers," she said. "They cannot create an apartment or a detox bed. They cannot make a resumé or give a grief circle to a group of boys that just lost a friend. That's not their skillset. It's not their job."

full article

Nov 24, 2025 6:00 AM

The Hard-Left Shooters Leading a Gun Culture Revolution

Earlier this year, I attended a shooting competition for queer, often trans, very online misfits. Then Charlie Kirk was killed.

Trans guntuber Tacticool Girlfriend at the Brutality match in Parma, Idaho.Photograph: Natalie Behring

Listen-20 minutes

This isn't the story I set out to write.

I was going to talk about a pretty feel-good firearms competition I went to earlier this year, where trans and queer people made up about a quarter of participants and the unofficial rule was you're not allowed to be a bigot. I was going to describe the strange and whimsical mix of subcultures people embraced there---like polyamory and Mad Max cosplay---wrapped up in pro-LGBT and Black Lives Matter patches.

Then Charlie Kirk was killed.

Suddenly I found myself wondering if I should write this story at all. If doing so would put my sources---gun-loving trans people in Trump's America---in danger. I'm still going to talk about the things I just mentioned. But this story, even as I write, continues to get darker.

It's late July, and I'm riding bitch in a pseudo golf cart at a gun range in the not-quite-desert that is Parma, Idaho, listening to two competitive shooters jokingly bicker over which one of them is more marginalized. One, a 22-year-old YouTuber who goes by Gun Bunny, is a Russian Jew who is poly-pansexual and has Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, a disability that makes her joints hurt, along with autism and ADHD. The other, our driver, is an Indigenous-Mexican Slovak Jew who is trans and chronically disabled. As we grind to a halt, dust from the dirt road blowing around us, Gun Bunny declares the other shooter a winner. "You have Slovak Jew, so you do have me beat," she says, to which our driver replies, "even the Russians screwed us." Laughing, Gun Bunny offers a truce and a mission for them both. "So what you're saying is we should team up to defeat Nazis."

A quarter of Brutality match attendees were LGBT+.

Photograph: Natalie Behring

YouTuber Gun Bunny at the Brutality match in Parma, Idaho.

Photograph: NATALIE BEHRING

Quip notwithstanding, the vibes at the High Desert Brutality match are closer to Burning Man than paramilitary. The shooting competition combines marksmanship with tasks like throwing 58-pound kettle bells down a field, lugging heavy jugs, running around in trenches, and hitting targets from a fast-moving postapocalyptic sand buggy, all under the beating hot sun. There's also a leftist theme ("a workers' rights uprising on Mars"), cosplay---Gun Bunny is dressed in a Dune-inspired grey stillsuit made from workout clothes and faux leather---and elaborate set design. It's one of the most intense shooting competitions I've been to and also one of the most queer-friendly events I've attended all year. Almost all of the 135 participants have traveled a long way.

Featured Video

While America has no dearth of shooting contests, there are only a handful of Brutality matches a year, and again and again I hear there's nothing else like them. A big part of that is the effort that goes into staging and the difficulty of the challenges. But a much bigger part is that minorities aren't made to feel like outsiders. "We will welcome with open arms anyone that isn't hateful," says event organizer Karl Kasarda, a 6-foot-tall firearms content creator on YouTube---aka a "guntuber"---with a salt-and-pepper undercut that flops to the right on top.

Karl Kasarda, who runs the InRange TV YouTube channel, hosts several Brutality matches a year.

Photograph: Natalie Behring

Kasarda is dressed in a sandy acid-wash T-shirt and tartan cargo pants---"postapocalyptic cowboy meets dad," Gun Bunny chimes in. A 51-year-old cis white man whose love of subcultures spans hacking, industrial music, and a stint as a minister with the Satanic Temple, Kasarda eschews the title of "leader." On the contrary, he says he has "a problem with authority" and "flirts" with the idea of anarchy. But there is no question he is largely responsible for building this alternative gun community, which he and others describe as the "punk rock outsiders of the shooting community."

"If you want to learn about guns, ask your spicy trans girlfriends."

His movement started about a decade ago with a YouTube channel, InRange TV, which now has around 930,000 followers. Kasarda's videos frequently focus on firearms history he believes many conservatives in the gun world would love to forget, like slave revolts, members of a Native American tribe kicking the KKK's ass in a standoff in North Carolina in 1958, and a possibly trans midwife in Colonel George Armstrong Custer's cavalry. The channel's description says it's "actively anti-racist, pro human liberation and LGBTQ+ rights," and Kasarda is a champion of "2A For All," the belief that everyone, particularly minorities, should have access to arms. While that might seem like a natural stance for any gun-loving American, Kasarda's views have pissed off right-wing gun nuts so badly that there are years-long angry threads about him on AR15.com and Kiwi Farms, a forum notorious for harassing trans folks. "We don't want to talk about marginalized communities depending on firearms because we don't like the marginalized communities," Kasarda says, of how right-wingers see the issue.

These tensions have gotten worse under Trump 2.0. After the president was reelected, left-leaning and queer-focused firearms organizations and classes like the Liberal Gun Club and the Pink Pistols told me they were seeing major spikes in interest and attendance. In early September, media outlets reported that Justice Department officials were considering a gun ban for trans people. In response, one trans gun content creator recommended trans Americans who'd been planning to purchase firearms "do so now."

Seconds before he was shot to death, Charlie Kirk shared a myth about trans people propagating mass shootings. An attendee at one of his Turning Point USA events asked him, "Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?" to which Kirk replied, "Too many." Numbers from the nonprofit Gun Violence Archive find that there have been five confirmed trans or nonbinary mass shooters between January 2013 and September 2025, making trans people responsible for less than 0.1 percent of the 5,748 mass shootings the group tracked in that time period.

Neither that data, nor the fact that the suspect in Kirk's killing is not trans, has stopped the right from using his death to further its crusade against transgender Americans. Bolstered by an early Wall Street Journal report, which cited an inaccurate federal memo saying authorities suspected there was "transgender and anti-fascist ideology" carved into some of the bullet casings at the scene, prominent Republicans have said trans people should be locked in mental institutions or not be allowed to use the internet. The Heritage Foundation, which published Project 2025, a policy blueprint for the Trump administration, is now calling for the Federal Bureau of Investigation to create a "Transgender Ideology-Inspired Violent Extremism" category for domestic terrorism.

As with many pro-gun Americans---and I've talked to lots on the left and right---plenty of Brutality match attendees are concerned with self-defense. "People see a threat, they're scared," says Jane Bird, a soft-spoken trans educator in her late thirties. We're chatting inside the clubhouse at the Parma Rod and Gun Club as the shooters prepare for the day. It's a basic shack, equipped with a bathroom and water and swarming with an ungodly number of flies. So is the rest of the range---apparently a result of a local farm's recent fertilizer deployment. Bird is resting before her plan to compete tomorrow in the Roaring 20s division, where she'll be cosplaying as Corporal Betsy, a lesbian character in Fallout: New Vegas. (Other divisions, like Cyberpunk and Space Cowboy, determine what styles of guns people can use---modern or historic.)

Trans educator Jane Bird.

Photograph: NATALIE BEHRING

Photograph: Natalie Behring

Bird lives in Iowa, a state that recently removed gender identity as a protected class from its Civil Rights Act. She doesn't want her real name used here because, as someone who works with kids, she believes it would "be very, very, very easy to end up on the LibsofTikTok or Tucker Carlson." In recent months, Bird and a handful of other progressive shooters have been hosting free self-defense 101 classes for marginalized people. Sometimes, that just means helping people realize that firearms aren't suited for them. "There's almost a stereotype, an in-group stereotype, that if you want to learn about guns, ask your spicy trans girlfriends," she says. "I'm now, I guess, one of those."

She's a good shot. She should be---growing up in Wisconsin, her dad, a competitive shooter since the '70s, was "buying guns for me before I was born," she says. Both the rifle and handgun she's using this weekend were his. She took a break from them in her twenties, due to the mental toll of being closeted. "I didn't want to be around anything that made self-harm easy," she says. The decision to come out also alienated her from certain family members, including her grandfather, who refused to call her by her name.

After she started getting back into shooting around 2019, she came across InRange TV through some friends at a since-defunct Iowa chapter of the Socialist Rifle Association. Her first reaction to a Brutality match was, "I could never do that." Now, she's not only doing it, she's part of InRange's staff, in charge of making their logos and designs. She shows me one of her patches---a mama possum carrying armed babies on her back; her water bottles are decked out in stickered slogans like "Protect Trans Youth."

Bird has been to two Brutality matches this year. (For non-staff, the competition fee is $300 to $400.) She contrasts the vibe at those events with that of a local shooting club. "The last time I tried to show up, there were two other women there, and when the second arrived, the first one said to her, 'I'm glad there's another real woman here for a change,'" Bird says. "I just decided it's really not worth it trying to go to those anymore."

A Brutality match attendee in Parma, Idaho.

Photograph: Natalie Behring

Even before Kirk's death, right-wing personalities like Andy Ngo were sharing images of trans people taking up arms on social media, implying they present a threat. Following the arrest of Kirk shooting suspect Tyler Robinson, that paranoia reached a fever pitch, with many ostensible supporters of the Second Amendment suggesting trans people be stripped of their arms. "How much do you want to bet we are going to find out there is a Trans terror cell that groomed Tyler Robinson and possibly even provided him with the gun to kill Charlie?" asked MAGA influencer Laura Loomer on X on September 13, following up with a slur. "There are literally shooting clubs now where removed meet up to learn how to shoot rifles and they wear shirts that say 'Kill fascists' and 'the 2nd Amendment is for shooting cops.' They are training for war. It's very dangerous."

Reader, they are not training for war. Certainly not at this event.

Instead, I've been getting the tea about how Brutality matches are a kink-friendly space from Deviant Ollam, a 48-year-old hacker and guntuber with an "arm trans women" patch above his right butt cheek and "Abolish ICE" stickers he's handing out freely. Ollam is poly, pansexual, and currently figuring out his status with Gun Bunny. The two of them, who have 180,000 and 22,000 YouTube subscribers, respectively, affectionately hold each other throughout the weekend. Bunny's boyfriend, who is married, poly, and wearing a "Pro Gun, Pro Gay, A Better Way 2A" shirt, is also here.

Gear at the Brutality match.

Photograph: Natalie Behring

Competitors at the event used modern and historic guns.

Photograph: NATALIE BEHRING

I follow Ollam onto a platform about 20 feet up a watch tower to start his challenge---long-distance shooting to take down colonial attack ships on this fantasy version of Mars. But 30 seconds after he pops off a few shots with his rifle, people start shouting "Fire!" They don't mean gunfire. Ollam's shots spark a grass fire in the dry, 90-degree heat. It's spreading fast and wide---huge plumes of smoke blowing into the air---and we all make our way closer to the range's parking lot as we wait for emergency crews to arrive.

With my reporting plan literally up in flames, I decide to meet with Tacticool Girlfriend, one of the few prominent trans guntubers, at her hotel room in nearby Nampa. Earlier in the day, before the event came to a sudden halt, I watched her shoot targets out of an abandoned school bus with an AR-15, later placing third at that stage. I was impressed by her speed and marksmanship. In the poorly lit room, which she's sharing with two fellow trans women shooters, her content-creation prowess comes to life. She knows her angles, and that's harder with a bulky AR-15 involved. She is striking. Her thick, black eyebrows and pronounced cheekbones make her stand out in a crowd, even when her mouth is covered by her keffiyeh, which she wears to hide her identity.

Trans guntuber Tacticool Girlfriend.

Photograph: Natalie Behring

Unlike some of the others, Tacticool Girlfriend, who is also a "straight-up" anarchist, says she's never felt unwelcome at any shooting events. Her friend, whom I'll call Nancy (they both ask that I not use their real names), even jokes that they love coming to small towns because people generally don't "clock" them as trans. But they did get some looks at a gun store, Nancy adds, so they tried to fit in. "As soon as we started talking shit about Gavin Newsom, they got real friendly," Nancy says. "It's annoying, because it's like, yeah, like, you hate liberals and I hate liberals, but not for the same reason."

Tacticool Girlfriend's interest in firearms stems from being a history buff doing Soviet Red Army reenactments, but leading up to Trump's 2016 win, she started training in earnest, with modern guns. "I just kind of saw the writing on the walls, like where America was going," she says. She's also been the target of threats and paranoid accusations. While she carries at all times, to be prepared for a worst-case scenario, she says she knows it doesn't guarantee her safety---and she's not seeking confrontation. "People give us way more credit than we actually deserve," she says. "We're just dressing up in our little costumes and shooting guns for fun."

At a backyard gathering of Brutality match shooters later that evening, Kasarda tells me about his YouTube interview, in January 2021, with Tacticool Girlfriend. At the time, he'd noticed her YouTube channel, which now has almost 67,000 subscribers, and wanted to signal-boost her. They talked about shooting matches and "stuff we liked." They didn't talk about trans issues, or even the fact that she is trans. Still, everyone lost their shit, Kasarda says. "What that boiled down to was a realization that I don't think there was a way to fix the old gun community," he says. There were people he had to ask to leave the InRange community. But he also lost half of his Patreon income and "most" industry contacts. (He doesn't accept sponsors because he feels they're a "corrupting influence.") "We've had to really build our own path forward," Kasarda says.

Kasarda's ability to rally people almost has me feeling a sense of kumbaya about the community he's helped create. One that is about to be tested again.

"Reverend Charles" dressed as a martian at the Brutality match.

Photograph: Natalie Behring

In the weeks following Kirk's killing, everything ramps up. I watch the conservative rage machine deploy against trans people. There's a witch hunt for Robinson's roommate, whom Utah governor Spencer Cox alleged is trans---a rumor that spread quickly. (This despite the fact that the roommate, whom Cox also described as "incredibly cooperative," has not publicly commented on their gender identity.) My editors and I discuss if and how to proceed. I think about the photos and videos of trans people on gun ranges being used to drum up fear, and wonder how---or if---our reporting can avoid the same fate.

I check in with my sources to see how they're reacting to the news. There is a wariness in everyone. A sense that the temperature can't be turned down, that some people cannot be defused of their conviction that we're in an ideological war---or maybe even the beginnings of a real one. There are also nerves about how this piece will come together, but also a desire for their stories to be heard and told accurately; that's about all I can offer, but it seems a worthwhile effort.

Bird tells me that, the week Kirk died, she'd had a range day planned to help a trans woman friend select her first firearm. A couple days after the shooting, she went to a gun store to pick up ammo for the session. "That is the most stared at I have been at a gun store for years," she says. It's a shop she's been to before, where she's normally asked if she needs help finding anything. This time, she says, people edged out of her way and avoided talking to her. Immediately after Kirk's death, she remembers thinking, "Oh, please don't let it be one of us." Even though Robinson isn't trans, she feels people like her are being punished "collectively."

But Bird does offer glimpses of optimism, in small ways. In August, a family member died, and she reconciled with her grandfather---the one who couldn't accept her transition---at the funeral. "The first thing he said to me was 'Jane,' and he gave me a huge hug and called me by my name again, and said, 'Your grandpa's finally come around.'" And despite the fact that she disagrees politically with many of the people she encounters at her local gun range, an instructor recently reminded members that the "Second Amendment has to be for everyone."

Kasarda, meanwhile, is still fighting toxicity within the wider gun community. A few hours after Kirk was shot, he posted on Bluesky denouncing the crime: "Assassinations are not self nor community defense. This country is not at war, and we should all strive for it not to be. Violence begets violence and it is never acceptable to instigate it." Then he sat in his home office and cried. Forums like AR15.com and Kiwi Farms still blamed him and accused him of being in "cya" (cover your ass) mode. Authorities still haven't stated Robinson's motive, though an indictment listing the charges against him, including aggravated murder, includes an interview with his mother saying he started leaning "more to the left," due to his "pro-gay and trans rights" views. Kasarda doesn't think it matters much. "We're headed to some very bad things as a result of this," he says.

The competition combines physically exhausting tasks with marksmanship.

Photograph: Natalie Behring

When I check in on Tacticool Girlfriend, she compares this moment to Italy's Years of Lead, a period of left- and right-wing terrorism from the late 1960s to the 1980s, in which hundreds of people were killed in over 14,000 attacks. If America is going to have another civil war, she predicts, it'll be closer to that than anything else.

Still, she says, she likes the life she's made for herself here, and she doesn't want to give it up. "Being a trans person in the world is inherently dangerous," she says. "There are people who hate us for no good reason, no matter where we go." At the end of the conversation, she tells me she has another shooting competition next weekend.

^Moira Millán, mapuche activist. Photo: Roxanna Sposar^

By Laura Carlsen

Some 40 people form a circle on the dusty, late-summer grass. Following days of uncertainty and fear, cut off from most forms of communication, families from Mapuche communities in Argentina's Chubut province gather to talk about what happened to them on Feb. 11.

At 7 AM that Tuesday, hundreds of Argentina's armed provincial and federal police forces raided their homes, smashing windows and destroying belongings. The special forces, wielding assault rifles, held men, women and children at gunpoint for more than ten hours.

During their day of terrorizing Mapuche families, police took cell phones and computers, leaving the communities---spread over miles at the eastern base of the Andes---cut off from each other. They confiscated books and farm tools, forced indigenous men, women and children to give DNA samples, semi-stripped young women and photographed tattoos and other body markings, manhandled elders, and separated young children from their parents while forcing toddlers to witness the violence against their mothers. In the twelve simultaneous strikes, police also broke into a Mapuche community radio in El Maiten, Radio Petu Mogelein, and destroyed vital communications equipment.

These communities, often just a handful of indigenous families that survived the bloody campaigns of genocide and displacement throughout Argentina's colonial history, are the now the target of a new offensive under the "anarchocapitalist" policies of Javier Milei. The repression aims at stripping them of the little they have left of their ancestral territory and placing it in the hands of some of the world's largest corporations and wealthiest billionaires.

Trawun, testimony

Outside one of the homes that was raided, Mapuche community members described the violence. A few international journalists and representatives of regional human rights organizations observed the trawun---a community gathering to share information, repair the community and plan strategy. We strained to hear the words of their testimonies as the wind whipped through a stand of poplar trees.

An 84-year-old elder pushed up his sleeve to show bruises from being thrown to the ground and cuffed by police. Young women described being forced to lie face down on the floor for hours and as police intimidated them with their guns. Children witnessed scenes of brutality that will mark them for life.

For hours the security forces refused to present a judicial order or inform indigenous families of the reason behind the violent invasion of their homes. Authorities finally presented a judicial order, signed by judge Jorge Criado, who was formally accused of racial discrimination against the Mapuche in a 2020 case, to investigate a vandalism attack Jan. 18 in Estancia Amancay 80 kilometers away.

Police arrested Victoria Núñez Fernández, a 37-year-old member of the Lof Pillan Mawiza who has lived with and worked with the Mapuche community for years. Witnesses and evidence from GPS records prove that Núñez Fernández was miles from the scene at the time the equipment was set on fire, but the judge ordered 60 days of house arrest as government authorities continue to declare her guilt.

Forest fires as a smokescreen

Since they began in December, Argentine government propaganda has blamed the Mapuches for forest fires that have burned more than 50,000 hectares of mostly national forest land in Patagonia. It's a triple ploy-- to distract from the role of climate change and government negligence in the fires, to divert attention from real estate interests waiting to take over land for megaprojects, and to criminalize the indigenous people who are the last the remaining bulwark against the mass exploitation and destruction of one of the world's largest freshwater and forest reserves.

^Forest in Patagonia, Argentina. Photo: Laura Carlsen^

"It's so outrageous that we should be blamed when actually the Mapuche community has always done everything to protect life here. We're part of the territory that we defend, and we're going to protect the life of the river, the life of the mountain, the life of the forest", Evis Millán of the Lof (community) Pillan Mawiza told me in an interview at her ranch by the river.

"We would never set fire to it. This set-up that the government of Chubut is carrying out with the national government has a clear objective--to name an internal enemy to cover up the criminalization and eviction of the Mapuche communities."

Without a trial or investigation, the day after the police operation, Governor Ignacio Torres of Chubut province presented a PowerPoint accusing the Mapuche of the fires and the vandalism. Flanked by hooded agents bearing machine guns in what was supposed to be a press conference, he projected the faces of four indigenous women, calling them "the persons responsible for the attack [on Amancay]" and swore "they will rot in jail". Among them was Victoria Núñez Fernández, still in custody, and Moira Millán. Moira Millán is an internationally known indigenous land defender, novelist and women's rights leader.

Torres' performance followed a playbook handed down from the far-right government of Javier Milei and his Minister of National Security Patricia Bullrich. Bullrich, whose ministry is also responsible for preventing and controlling forest fires, has long promoted usurping land from indigenous peoples for sale on the international market. Following the raids, she released a video with images of the police raid on Millan's home, stating, "These people will be declared under Article 41 TER-ROR-ISTS".

Milei's government established the legal framework for this extreme measure just days after the raids, when it listed "RESISTENCIA ANCESTRAL MAPUCHE (RAM)" (Mapuche Ancestral resistance) as a terrorist organization in the Public Registry of Persons and Entities linked to Acts of Terrorism and its Financing. The RAM is an invention to smear the Mapuche people; the communities have stated repeatedly they have no knowledge of or contact with it. There's only one person identified with the RAM, Facundo Jones Huala. Despite taking credit for the vandalism at Amancay, Jones Huala has not been arrested and makes no effort to hide from authorities. Meanwhile, the government continues hold Núñez Fernandez on trumped-up charges and to make the untenable claim that a handful of Mapuche women torched the forests they live in as an act of revenge for efforts to displace them.

Mapuches in the Patagonia point to powerful economic interests with ties to Milei's government as the real culprits behind the fires.

A fire sale of the Patagonia

The forest fires that destroyed thousands of acres in the summer months are finally being quelled by autumn rains. Experts have warned that the high temperatures and low rainfall caused by climate change is behind rising fire destruction in the region. But local governments and the government of Javier Milei---a climate change denier---prefer to blame the Mapuche, while taking advantage of the destruction to privatize a land coveted for its minerals and pure water, and for its natural beauty and remoteness.

Milei began preparations to sell off the Patagonia to foreigners as soon as he took office. Using presidential decrees, he repealed the law that limited foreign land ownership on Dec. 21 as part of a package of decrees to deregulate the economy and promote sale of resources to foreign investors.

In what seem to be moves to increase the vulnerability of protected natural reserves, he eliminated the Fund for the Protection of Forests and transferred responsibility to the security ministry, leaving a huge void in know-how, infrastructure and funding to confront forest fires, despite the fact that each year fire destroys more forest land. He also cut spending of the National Service for Fire Management by 81%.

Milei also announced the repeal of the law that bans the immediate sale of land affected by fire for agribusiness and real estate development. This kind of law exists in most countries as a necessary safeguard against business incentives to torch public lands. Although the repeal has not gone into effect yet, it recently passed committee in the Senate and continues to be a key element in the government's plan for a massive fire sale of Patagonian lands.

Mining companies, real estate interests, hydroelectric plants and other megaproject developers have long waited to get their hands on more land in Argentina's Patagonia. Milei is banking on the sell-off of indigenous territories and resources to help pay for the huge debt he hopes to receive in order to prop up the Argentina peso and avoid the total collapse that looms under his radical free-market policies.

Neocolonialism, rebooted

The Milei government has mapped the road forward for the Patagonia, and it runs right over the bodies and the territories of the Mapuche people. To mask its own complicity with business interests hoping to move onto affected lands, the Milei government launched a media and legal strategy to deflect attention from the link between the fires and land-use changes that stand to benefit billionaire foreigners, and to neutralize the Mapuche-Tehuelche people who stand in their way through criminalization, eviction and extermination.

The formula is not new. Crusades against the Mapuche began with the conquest of their ancestral lands centuries ago and has not let up since then. The current crisis has the same colonial roots as previous genocidal campaigns: racism and the takeover of land and resources by force.

In January, Bullrich ordered the eviction of the Lof Pailako in the Los Alerces National Park. To avoid bloodshed, community members abandoned their homes hours before the arrival of police forces. Families were left homeless, animals without sustenance and children without access to housing, health or education. Bullrich stated triumphantly: "This is the first eviction of a series that will mark the end of a period in which a lack of respect for private property reigned in Argentina."

The Minister of Security acts with the full backing of the federal and provincial governments. Milei, an admirer of Donald Trump and member of the international far right, launched the offensive against the Mapuche with his trademark free-market and white supremacist zealotry. While giving investors free rein, he ended indigenous land registry programs and rescinded Law 26.160, the Emergency Indigenous Territory Law of 2006 that at least nominally suspended evictions of indigenous communities in indigenous territory. Despite having signed on to international indigenous rights treaties, successive governments of both the right and the left failed to institutionalize recognition of land and rights, paving the way for Milei to revert gains and protections for the communities.

Human rights organizations have denounced the repeal of indigenous rights to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the Office of the Rapporteur on Indigenous Peoples and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.

^The Patagonia, Argentina. Photo: Laura Carlsen^

The billionaire bonanza

As the Mapuche are violently evicted from the few hectares of land they live on, international billionaires already own, often illegally, millions of hectares in the Argentine Patagonia and are looking to take over more. The ultra-rich set their sights on this land with its sweeping views of the Andes and miles of clear lakes and open woods decades ago. The region holds much of the earth's remaining fresh water, clean air and pristine forests. Corporations have moved in to exploit natural resources, and individual billionaires see the region as their private playground and a refuge for when the rest of the planet becomes inhabitable.

A case point is Lago Escondido, property of the British multimillionaire Joe Lewis. Lewis owns 12-14 thousand hectares including the entire lake. Although he has entertained Argentine presidents and foreign dignitaries on his property, it's sealed it off to public access by physical barriers and armed guards. Other foreign interests with extensive holdings in the Argentine Patagonia include the Israeli firm Mekorot, the Italian firm Benetton, the actor Sylvester Stallone, and investment companies from United Arab Emirates, among others.

Like Trump, Milei's government of the rich and for the rich has acted fast to remove environmental and social restrictions. Milei instituted a new Incentive Regime for Large Investments (RIGI by its Spanish initials) last year that provides tax breaks, customs incentives and foreign exchange benefits for projects of more than 200 million dollars that are initiated within two years. The law will promote the kind of large-scale extractivist projects that citizen groups and Mapuche communities have opposed for uprooting communities and destroying the land.

An analysis of the likely impact of RIGI in Chubut finds that the Patagonian province could see a rapid boom in mining and oil and gas exploitation. Chubut has a ban on open-pit mining--the result of grassroots organizing. Experts fear a legal challenge that could result in overturning the popular will expressed in the ban.

RIGI and the other programs to sell the Patagonia to foreign investors set the scene for local conflicts over land and resource use. Billionaire land owners stand to profit enormously from Milei's measures and already have drawn up plans to expand holdings and operations.

The attacks, expulsions and criminalization of the Mapuche communities can be seen as a preemptive measure to weaken forces that defend native lands and environmental protection.

Reinforcing the Police State

The federal government has prepared to put down resistance by legalizing violent repression of local and national opposition. On March 10, Congress passed the so-called "Anti-Mafias Law" that mandates that all members of a group can be given the same sentence as a single member, a law the international associations of jurists and human rights organizations have called the "legalization of a virtual state of siege" especially designed to apply to those most hurt by Milei's measure--the poor, political opposition, unionists and indigenous peoples.

Milei's government also adopted an "anti-picket protocol" that criminalizes protest. These measures have led to more than a thousand protesters injured due to excessive use of force, according to a report by Amnesty International. Most recently, police fired a gas canister directly at a photographer during March 12 protests. The photographer Pablo Grillo, whose skull was broken, is still in intensive therapy.

The recreation of a brutal police state in Argentina conjures images of the military dictatorship, a period of state terrorism that lasted from 1976 to 1983. Millan warns that the Milei government is a dictatorship and that the country is seeing a return to the "state terrorism" that led to thousands of assassinations and disappearances during the military dictatorship.

When Caring for Land and Culture Means Risking your Life

It's not surprising that the regime has made indigenous women the center of its defamation campaign. Women are the core of Mapuche defense of their territory and the protection of the land and life against extractivist projects and privatization. They've worked for decades to consolidate and reestablish communities in ancestral lands, teach new generations the Mapuche language and customs, and build peaceful resistance. The latest government-corporate offensive has put their lives and liberty at grave risk.

^Lakes in Patagonia. Photo: Laura Carlsen^

"This group in power---patriarchal, racist ---feels threatened by the capacity and the defense of life that we women carry out," Moira explained in a recent interview. "The State and the corporations know that women can build alliances among sectors to defend rights so they need to weaken this strong organizational process in this historic moment, including at the global level." In this context she added, the openly misogynist attacks of the Milei government are strategic, they're being incorporated into public policy, and they are a focus of repressive policies.

Despite all the forces against them, today's Mapuche communities continue to live on and care for their land. They protect the rivers and lakes, and manage the forests to keep trees healthy, prevent fire damage and control invasive species. Some have lived on these lands continuously for generations, others have returned from forced migration to urban slums to rebuild their lives, their land and their identity.

Almost every day during the weeks of our visit, the women left the house early to hold traditional ceremonies. Language, spirituality, and ancestral knowledge and practices are nourished through daily life, family and community ties. Even after the genocidal campaigns and the speeches devoted to denying their existence (the government frequently speaks of "pseudo-Mapuches") or spreading hate, these communities still survive and it's because of them that the region still offers world-famous fresh water, abundant fish and unspoiled views.

The power of example can be more threatening to illegitimate power than might. Two radically different views of the land and humans' relationship to it are in play here. As plans advance to create an extractivist enclave out of nature's masterpiece, Moira Millán summed it up: "We have firmly opposed extractivist large-scale mining, dams, hydroelectric projects that would murder the river to provide electricity to transnationals and lately the aqueduct that oil companies are pushing for. The Mapuche people recover land to reaffirm the commitment to life. For us, life is the most important. And not just human life, the life of everything in our surroundings."

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/19107

Forest fires in southern Argentina have scorched more than 15,000 hectares (37,000 acres) this week, authorities said, though rain began falling in parts of Patagonia on Sunday to the relief of residents.

From Earth News - Earth Science News, Earth Science, Climate Change via This RSS Feed.

Backup Link: https://tankie.tube/w/quw6QrfknmUghS74GCmGea

As the Trump administration increases the presence of federal agents in U.S. cities, a local group identifying as part of the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense has become more active in Philadelphia.

The group says it is a resurgence of the militant Black power group dating back to the 1960s, and has been trained by some of the original party's surviving members. Several attended an anti-ICE protest Wednesday at Philadelphia City Hall, carrying military-style weapons.

They say they're legally permitted to carry firearms and are showing up as a response to violence from the Trump administration.

The group has been holding regular weekly free food programs in North Philadelphia for several years, according to 39-year-old Paul Birdsong of West Philadelphia, who identifies himself as the Black Panther Party's national chairman.

Birdsong and others attended the Philly protest one day after Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer Jonathan Ross shot and killed 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis.

"That wouldn't have happened if we were there," Birdsong said. "Not a single person would have gotten touched."

Jane Wiedman of Mt. Airy holds up a sign among the crowd of protesters at City Hall on Thursday, Jan. 8, 2026, as they gather for a vigil to rally against the killing of Renee Good, who was shot by an ICE agent in Minneapolis, Minn.... Read moreAllie Ippolito / For The Inquirer

Millions of people have watched videos of the shooting online, sparking national protests. The Trump administration quickly defended the shooter, with J.D. Vance asserting Ross has "absolute immunity" and "was doing his job." Some have rejected Vance's suggestion that Ross couldn't be tried by the state, and Minnesota leaders Friday renewed their calls for state involvement in an investigation of the shooting.

Birdsong said the group wants to see ICE abolished and the Trump administration held accountable.

"You got people that are part of a cabal, that are self serving ... and they prey on the common folks of the United States," Birdsong said.

Philadelphia Black Panther Party for Self-Defense member Skiippy (right) hands soup to Yolanda Gray (center) and Roxanne Hart outside the organization in North Philadelphia on Friday, Jan. 9, 2026. The Philadelphia Black Panther Party for Self-Defense helps supply food and clothes for residents.... Read moreYong Kim / Staff Photographer

A free food program

Birdsong said he was recruited by members of the Black Panther Party in the wake of the 2020 police killing of George Floyd, and he listed several surviving elders of the group as mentors. The Philly chapter has "less than 100" members, he said, though he declined to provide more detail.

On Friday evening, Birdsong and several other Black Panther Party members set upa pop-up food pantry outside Church of the Advocate at the corner of 18th and Diamond Streets in North Philadelphia.

The members laid out bananas, grapes, salad, romaine lettuce, cherry tomatoes, apples, pears, celery, peppers, and mushrooms on folding tables.

They added bread, Tastykakes

immediately popular with passing children

canned food, and hygiene items like shampoo, COVID-19 test kits, and adult undergarments. On another table were children's clothes and a large pot of chicken soup, all near a banner with the Black Panthers logo.

Philadelphia Black Panther Party for Self-Defense member Sharon Fischer (left) hands a bag of food to Daren Robison outside the organization in North Philadelphia on Friday, Jan. 9, 2026. The Philadelphia Black Panther Party for Self-Defense supplies food and clothes for residents.... Read moreYong Kim / Staff Photographer

Birdsong said the money to buy the food comes from members' own paychecks, as well as donations from people in the community.

"It really helps out," said Dawn Henkins, 60, who lives nearby. She said it's especially helpful for older people who are living on a fixed income.

"The brothers can help people

they are here for the people," Henkins said.

The Black Panthers previously held food programs at 33rd and Cecil B. Moore, and at Jefferson Square Park, Birdsong said. More recently, the group was able to move into 2123 N. Gratz St.

a location that Birdsong says once was a headquarters for the original Black Panther Party Philadelphia chapter.

The original Black Panther Party was founded by Bobby Seale and Huey P. Newton in Oakland, California in 1966 and was active nationally until the early 1980s. The group formed to fight against police brutality and quickly evolved to promote other social changes including prison reform and access to education, food, and healthcare, according to the National Museum of African American History and Culture.

The group was soon targeted by the J. Edgar Hoover's FBI, which sought to "discredit, disrupt, and destroy" the Black rights movement, according to UC Berkeley Library. Two Black Panthers in Chicago, Fred Hampton and Mark Clark, were killed in a Chicago police raid that was later revealed to have been coordinated by the FBI.

The Philadelphia chapter was active from 1968 until 1973, according to a University of Washington website that maps U.S. social movements. Prominent local figures from this era include Sultan Ahmad, who went on to hold roles in city government, and Paula Peebles, a social activist who stayed involved in the Black Panthers for much of her life.

The Black Panther Party for Self-Defense headquarters in North Philadelphia on Friday, Jan. 9, 2026.Yong Kim / Staff Photographer

One person who stopped by for soup on Friday, Jerome Hill, 63, said he can distantly remember the days when Episcopalian pastor and social activist Rev. Paul Washington let the Black Panthers hold events at Church of the Advocate.

"They primarily were always community oriented," Hill said. He said he's glad to see the group handing out food, and added that they could serve as role models for younger people in the neighborhood.

While one member of the group served up chicken soup to several boys who stopped by the tables, another member stood at the corner holding an AK-47-style rifle.

"I feel like we're welcome," said one member, also carrying a firearm, who identified himself as Comrade Arch. He said he was a fan of the original group growing up, and he joined a few months ago. "I've always had a revolutionary spirit."

Under a canopy behind the tables, Birdsong moved back his jacket to reveal a modern MP5, a weapon that has its origins in German submachine guns. He also carried two semiautomatic handguns.

It's a controversial posture: Many pro-democracy advocates and experts on civil rights emphasize that nonviolence is essential to successful protest movements.

The law says you can carry a gun in Philadelphia

but only if you have a license to carry firearms, according to Dillon Harris, an attorney who focuses on gun rights.

"Open carry," or carrying a firearm in a way that it can be plainly seen by others, is "generally lawful" in Pennsylvania, except for in prohibited locations such as federal buildings, said Harris.

But Philadelphia is an exception to this rule, Harris said. A state law prohibits carrying firearms in "a first class city" without a license to carry firearms. That statute applies to Philadelphia.

But while many civil rights advocates argue that firearms tend to escalate violent confrontations, rather than prevent them, it's long been part of the Black Panthers' tactics, and Birdsong pushed back against that idea.

"We feel safe," Birdsong said. "No police, no drug dealers doing anything to us here."

Armed members of the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense march down Market Street with a crowd of protesters on Thursday, Jan. 8, 2026, to rally against the killing of Renee Good, who was shot by an ICE agent in Minneapolis, Minn.... Read more

Allie Ippolito / For The Inquirer

via https://xcancel.com/JamalCheaib/status/2010084833381294495

Based on information available as of this moment (Saturday, January 10, 2026), the United States has witnessed approximately 1,000 demonstrations in response to the killing of Renee Nicole Goode.

1. Scale and Locations of Demonstrations The U.S. is witnessing a massive wave of coordinated protests under the banner "ICE Out for Good" (a play on her surname and a demand to oust the immigration agency). Reports indicate hundreds of demonstrations (with some sources estimating over 1,000 events) nationwide throughout this weekend.

Key cities that have seen or are seeing protests:

• Minneapolis, MN (Epicenter): The largest and most sustained protests, specifically at Powderhorn Park and in front of federal buildings.
• Philadelphia, PA: Marches toward federal detention centers.
• Indianapolis, IN: Hundreds gathered at Monument Circle.
• Austin and Pflugerville, TX.
• Portland, OR: Witnessed violent protests and another shooting related to the protests.
• Fayetteville and Durham, NC.
• Santa Barbara, CA.
• Atlanta, GA.
• Champaign, IL.
• Plus events in: Florida, Ohio, Kansas, New Mexico, and Michigan.

2. Calls to Protest Today or Tomorrow Today (Saturday, January 10, 2026): This is considered the main National Day of Action. Organizations like "Indivisible" and immigrant rights coalitions called for mobilization in all 50 states. Demonstrations are taking place right now (at the time of writing) in main squares and outside federal buildings.

Tomorrow (Sunday, January 11, 2026): Protests and vigils are expected to continue in many cities, particularly in Minneapolis and Portland, due to the significant momentum and rapid developments, even though Saturday was the scheduled central mobilization day.

3. Quick Background (Context) The Incident: Renee Nicole Goode (37, poet and mother) was killed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) fire on Wednesday, January 7, in Minneapolis while inside her vehicle.

Reason for Outrage: There is a stark conflict in narratives; the Trump administration labeled her a "domestic terrorist" who attempted to run over agents, while her family and circulating videos insist she was trying to drive away and the shooting was aggressive and unjustified. Additionally, the victim was a U.S. citizen and a member of the LGBTQ+ community, which broadened the scope of solidarity with her.

Sources: CNN, MSNBC, AP

The New York Times and The Washington Post

Star Tribune (Minneapolis - primary source for original event details and central protests).

The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia).

The Indianapolis Star (Indianapolis).

Austin American-Statesman (Texas).

The Oregonian (Portland - for coverage of events currently in progress).

Original Reddit Post: https://www.reddit.com/r/minnesota/comments/1qabuvr/icecbp_kicks_off_doortodoor_raids_in_minneapolis/

Backup of video: https://tankie.tube/w/38g2B9bzhC7cEBu1gEAPQM

Another angle: https://tankie.tube/w/qBSPLQJgXNVkeoBAekRxWK

https://www.reddit.com/r/UnderReportedNews/comments/1qafk9i/more_footage_from_the_doortodoor_raids_taking/

Here is the original AP video: https://apnews.com/video/federal-agents-make-arrest-in-minneapolis-as-protesters-surround-them-230a8a2ddec944d1975c231db52433e0

There is more at the end. They may have had an order for this persons arrest.

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/18923

It’s the first week of 2026 and it feels like a decade already. Here’s a quick recap of this week.

From BreakThrough News via This RSS Feed.

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/18892

From More Perfect Union via This RSS Feed.

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/18421

On Thursday, Republicans in the House failed to override President Donald Trump’s first two vetoes in office: a pipeline project that would bring safe drinking water to rural Colorado, and another that would return land to the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians in Florida. Their inability to block the president’s move signals their commitment to the White House over their prior support for the measures.

The Miccosukee have always considered the Florida Everglades as their home. So when Republicans in Congress voted to expand the tribe’s land base under the Miccosukee Reserved Area Act – legislation that would transfer 30 acres of land in the Everglades to tribal control – the Miccosukee were thrilled. After years of work, the move would have allowed the tribe to begin environmental restoration activities in the area, and better protect it from climate change impacts as extreme flooding and tropical storms threaten the land.

A portion of the Miccosukee Indian Reservation in Florida’s Everglades known as a tree island, Thursday, July, 11, 2024. Rebecca Blackwell / AP Photo

“The measure reflected years of bipartisan work and was intended to clarify land status and support basic protections for tribal members who have lived in this area for generations,” wrote Chairman Cypress in a statement last week. “Before the roads and canals were built, and before Everglades National Park was created.”

The act was passed on December 11th, but on December 30th, President Donald Trump vetoed it; one of only two vetoes made by the administration since he took office. In a statement, Trump explained that the tribe “actively sought to obstruct reasonable immigration policies that the American people decisively voted for when I was elected,” after the tribe’s July lawsuit challenging the construction of “Alligator Alcatraz”, an immigration detention center in the Everglades.

“It is rare for an administration to veto a bill for reasons wholly unrelated to the merits of the bill,” said Kevin Washburn, a law professor at University of California Berkeley Law and former assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs for the Department of the Interior. Washburn added that while denying land return to a tribe is a political act, Trump’s move is “highly unusual.”

When a tribe regains land, the process can be long and costly. The process, known as “land into trust” transfers land title from a tribe to the United States, where the land is then held for the benefit of the tribe and establishes tribal jurisdiction over the land in question. When tribal nations signed treaties in the 19th century ceding land, any lands reserved for tribes, generally, reservations, were held by the federal government “in trust” for the benefit of tribes—meaning tribal nations don’t own these lands despite their sovereign status.

Almost all land into trust requests are facilitated at an administrative level by the Department of Interior. The Miccosukee, however, generally must follow a different process. Recognized as a tribal nation by the federal government in 1962, the Miccosukee navigate a unique structure for acquiring tribal land where these requests are made through Congress via legislation instead of by Interior.

“It’s ironic, right?” said Matthew Fletcher, a law professor at the University of Michigan. “You’re acquiring land that your colonizer probably took from you a long time ago and then gave it away to or sold it to someone else, and then years later, you’re buying that land back that was taken from you illegally, at a great expense.”

While land into trust applications related to tribal gaming operations often meet opposition, Fletcher says applications, like the Miccosukee’s, are usually frictionless. And in cases like the Miccosukee Reserved Area Act which received bipartisan support at the state and federal levels, in trust applications are all but guaranteed.

On the House floor on Thursday before the vote, Florida’s Democratic Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz said “this bill is so narrowly focused that [the veto] makes absolutely no sense other than the interest in vengeance that seems to have emanated in this result.” The bill’s sponsor, Republican Representative Carlos Gimenez of Florida, did not respond to requests for comment. In July last year, Gimenez referred to the Miccosukee Tribe as stewards of the Everglades, sponsoring the bill as a way to manage water flow and advance an elevation project, under protection from the Department of Interior, for the village to avert “catastrophic flooding.”

“What you’re asking is for people in the same political party of the guy who just vetoed this thing to affirmatively reject the political decision of the President,” Fletcher said.
The tribe is unlikely to see its village project materialize under Trump’s second term unless the outcome of this year’s midterms invites a Democratic-controlled House and Senate. Studies show that the return of land to tribes provides the best outcomes for the climate.

This story was originally published by Grist with the headline The Miccosukee Tribe blocked Alligator Alcatraz. Then Trump blocked a bill to return their land. on Jan 9, 2026.

From Grist via This RSS Feed.