[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

Hamas supports it, so do I.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

The burden of marxists is that we understand our opponents positions and our own, but they don’t understand either.

179
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Tbf a lot of people just want a petty bourgeois vacation.

I’ve been on a socia media break, but I’ll post some memes.

53
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

~semi-~ Serious question, Idon’t get it. Most of us get why the hegemonic gender system is stupid, why subscribe to the binary role you were assigned? Also, why do straight people exist? Maybe it’s just me but I like to look and feel like my own perception of what is attractive.

21
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Context: The first one, the character is avoiding going to his best friend’s house because he doesn’t want to see his wife who’s mutually in love with him. The second, Chernyshevsky randomly spends a super long amount of time talking about a type of person that he really likes which will have no bearing on the story.

14
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

13
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This Existential Comics-like sketch popped into my brain while I was reading Capital. I'm not well-read enough to make their personalities and language very accurate, but I tried to get their ideas right.

Engels, Marx, Hegel, Descartes, and Spinoza are sitting together at table.

Engels: Thank you for coming to this meeting of enlightenment dialecticians. Today the topic of discussion will be “free will.” Does anyone want to start?

Descartes: Well, obviously we have free will because God is good, and he gave it to us. God created us and left us the world so that we could affect the world in ways that would decide whether we go to heaven.

Hegel: I agree to an extent, our free wills move forward history by making rational arguments advancing the world spirit. That does not mean we are just souls doing whatever we want. We pick rational choices in line with the dominant thinking of our society.

Marx: Religion may comfort people, but there is no god to give free will. Hegel’s sort of on track, but the limits on freedom are material not ideal. People have material conditions that greatly limit the choices they can make, but the masses ultimate move history forward, not simply ideas.

Descartes: What do you mean there’s no God? I literally proved it in my fifth meditation!

Marx: No, you didn’t, you idealist fool! There are no non-material things and nothing can be proved by pure reason.

Spinoza: I agree with Marx. We are all part of the one material world. However, that has implications for your argument too Karl. Our minds are material too, and therefore our actions are a result not only of outside conditions, but also the material that makes up our minds is also a part of God. Thus, we are ourselves nature acting out deterministically, and free will is an illusion.

Descartes: What God are you talking about?!

Engels: Ignoring Descartes, You are not wrong, though the wills of humanity still move forward history toward communism regardless of if they are free.

Spinoza: True enough.

Hegel: What do you mean forward to communism? I live in the end of history. There is nothing beyond constitutional monarchy.

Marx: You bourgeois idealist bastard!

Marx gets out of his seat and goes to flip Hegel on his head.

Engels: That’s enough everyone. He mutters under his breath. I should’ve picked a different topic.

5
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This Existential Comics-like sketch popped into my brain while I was reading Capital. I'm not well-read enough to make their personalities and language very accurate, but I tried to get their ideas right.

Engels, Marx, Hegel, Descartes, and Spinoza are sitting together at table.

Engels: Thank you for coming to this meeting of enlightenment dialecticians. Today the topic of discussion will be “free will.” Does anyone want to start?

Descartes: Well, obviously we have free will because God is good, and he gave it to us. God created us and left us the world so that we could affect the world in ways that would decide whether we go to heaven.

Hegel: I agree to an extent, our free wills move forward history by making rational arguments advancing the world spirit. That does not mean we are just souls doing whatever we want. We pick rational choices in line with the dominant thinking of our society.

Marx: Religion may comfort people, but there is no god to give free will. Hegel’s sort of on track, but the limits on freedom are material not ideal. People have material conditions that greatly limit the choices they can make, but the masses ultimate move history forward, not simply ideas.

Descartes: What do you mean there’s no God? I literally proved it in my fifth meditation!

Marx: No, you didn’t, you idealist fool! There are no non-material things and nothing can be proved by pure reason.

Spinoza: I agree with Marx. We are all part of the one material world. However, that has implications for your argument too Karl. Our minds are material too, and therefore our actions are a result not only of outside conditions, but also the material that makes up our minds is also a part of God. Thus, we are ourselves nature acting out deterministically, and free will is an illusion.

Descartes: What God are you talking about?!

Engels: Ignoring Descartes, You are not wrong, though the wills of humanity still move forward history toward communism regardless of if they are free.

Spinoza: True enough.

Hegel: What do you mean forward to communism? I live in the end of history. There is nothing beyond constitutional monarchy.

Marx: You bourgeois idealist bastard!

Marx gets out of his seat and goes to flip Hegel on his head.

Engels: That’s enough everyone. He mutters under his breath. I should’ve picked a different topic.

15
Determinism W (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
100
Determinism W (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
52
Determinism W (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I understand that it's a method that ascribes purposes to things. I have heard people speak very highly and lowly of it. On the one hand people say it has greater explanatory power than cause and effect. On the other, it assumes purpose in a meaningless universe. So which is it? Is it a good framework?

60
The Red Banner (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

In being subjected to both church and uneducational classes at school I am left with time to hypothetically do things, yet many activities are precluded. As a human being I have finite time yet vast options which I would like to pursue. I consider these frequent instances as complete wastes of time. Yet I remember the stoic teaching about focusing on what you can control. I am prohibited from having my phone (too obviously) or anything in/covering my ears. I would like to read, but the voices are distracting. My rubik's cube is considered too loud. Meditation is also impossible. Any advice/suggestions?

[-] [email protected] 39 points 2 years ago

When i first saw this i instinctively sided Roderic Day (refer to hexbear struggle session), but increasingly I've come to the conclusion that Hakim is not in fact proselytizing, he is simply answering the questions of people who came to their Muslim comrade with questions about Islam.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We should unite with all progressive forces including religious ones. My full critical support is with the PIJ. It totally makes sense for us to look into Islam to understand that perspective and the role it’s played in history and the present. However, ultimately we are materialists and it’s kind of weird to evangelize to Marxists. In this instance Day is principled, but ~~kind of~~ annoying.

Edit: I don’t think Hakim is proselytizing anymore

[-] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago

“Genocide kinda bad, but don’t be mean to the genociders. If you make tunnels or throw a rock you are infinitely eviler.”

[-] [email protected] 39 points 2 years ago

The reality is there are a lot of usufferable anarchists (especially online) who refuse to engage with real theory or history. I have all respect for people like you who critically support AES but maintain a different ideology. I and some others on here do try to make clear the difference between pop anarchists who hate China because they’re told to despite “being against all authority” and your time. Yes, some here go too far with it, and I do not agree, but I see where they are coming from.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago

I frequently worry mods here are a little ban heavy. I can only imagine what it’s like on reactionary instances.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 2 years ago

I was saying this recently. For the test of whether you are an anti-imperialist leftist the only real questions need to be “Russia or NATO” and “Israel or Palestine.”

[-] [email protected] 41 points 2 years ago

Nimrod

Lol, accurate naming

[-] [email protected] 40 points 2 years ago

To start just encourage empathy, generosity, collectivism, and a desire to learn. Eventually when they start to notice liberal programming just simply debunk it. When they here about billionaires in the news or from peers tell them about how much exploitation, greed, and luck got them to have that wealth. Point out how many better things could be done with it. If you see homeless people in the street tell them about the injustice of the system that brought them there. How there are many homes that they could live in, but the landowners are too greedy to let them. Just frequently talk about social issues in your household and the children will listen and try to understand, because as a parent you’re interesting to them, they might even ask questions. I could go on for a while, but I hope this helpful.

PS I’m actually a teen and this is what my socdem parents did for me. I’m sure the values they instilled are a major reason why I’m a commie today.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe the genie was espousing the perfect adventurist plot and target that would truly get the masses to rise this time before it got redacted. On the other hand the genie probably told the character they needed to organize and maybe even recited multiple entire audiobooks before it got removed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

QueerCommie

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF