ObiWanGurobi

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I'll happily pay these 30% if it means I get quality services for them:

  • high speed download servers
  • reliable cloud saves
  • automatic, non intrusive updates
  • discussion forums
  • easy mod management
  • friend networking, multiplayer services
  • responsive and uncomplicated support

(using Steam as an example here)

People always act like those are to be taken as granted, but if you have ever worked in dev/devops, you would know that there's a lot of work maintaining each one of them.

Also, you can use these services for as long as you want, despite paying for them with a single one-time purchase.

Of course, if the platform doesn't provide any services or benefits, your point stands. In that case just avoid it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My two cockatiels Oreo and Kiri preening each other

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not even making it a discussion. You mentioned metacritic in your (now edited) comment and I explained why metacritic's system actively encourages review bombing. So it's no wonder you'll see a decent amount of review bombing there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Check the usernames, that wasn't me

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Because my initial comment was about metacritic and my argument is that metacritic is a bad indicator of review bombing because it actually encourages it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

The reason it's lower on metacritic is mainly due to the fact that the critics rating is too high, imo. This leads to disappointed players leaving extra bad scores (i.e. 0/10) to offset the total score. In a way that's review bombing, but only as a reaction to the inflated critics' reviews (which I often suspect to be bought or bribed).

Usually the Steam reviews are a lot more reliable. As I said, metacritic's system is shit and encourages rating manipulation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Metacritic's user rating system is just shit. You see the game rated higher than deserved and you can either

  • give it an honest rating resulting in the total score dropping by 0.01
  • give it a zero rating and have the score drop by 0.1

Of course most people chose to rate it in a way that has more impact on the total score, so it's no wonder we see 0/10 and 10/10 more than anything else.

This phenomenon will be even more exaggerated if critics ratings are undeservedly high, as is the case with Starfield.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The new System Shock remake. I needed to draw a map of all elevator connections because Citadel station is extremely convoluted. Also, you get codes (or parts of codes) and instructions here an there, that you'll need later on.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ja, die Firma in der ich arbeite, implementiert das System für die Bahn

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Das soll künftig der offizielle Ersatz für strecken.info werden. Ist im Moment nur als Beta veröffentlicht, da noch einige Funktionen fehlen.

Und die Einrichtung der Subdomains ist bei der Bahn immer ein bisschen ein organisatorisches Geschiss - da war es einfacher, für die Zeit der Entwicklung ne neue Domain zu besorgen.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (7 children)
view more: next ›