[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Honestly, I have no idea myself. I first saw it at GDQ yesterday (or so).

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Arctic Eggs kind of cooking going on here.

[-] [email protected] 99 points 1 month ago

Took me a second too, but it's supposed to be a list of descriptors of the woman in the picture. A better way to form it would be "She uses drugs, but she is also a wife, a coworker, and a grandmother." with the last three as bullet points.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 4 months ago

I doubt he planned to kill the player. He was planning to wait at the finish line to beat us to it. Then he realizes who the final boss is, becomes coinvinced he can't beat it, and reasons that since it is impossible for him it must also be impossible for everyone else. Then he tries to kill us because he is afraid we will prove that it isn't actually impossible. That's my read on it, anyway.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

Yeah, correct guess. In the game you kill the leader of the dominant religion (based on martyrdom and sacrifice) after they have refused to take action against the corruption in their own ranks, and allowed atrocities to be committed in the name of religion. Turns out (spoilers) that the head of the religion is also corrupt. Not really subtle, is it?

[-] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago

You couldn't have written this on that keyboard. That keyboard has no a (or z).

[-] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The short text at the back of the book/cover that is usually a summary of what the book is about, I believe. Also often had some short reviews, like the op title refers to. (The stuff you look at when you are deciding if you want to read the book or not, generally.)

[-] [email protected] 45 points 9 months ago

Yes, but then we are talking about this kind of high heel:

There is a big gap between this and the kind of heels that the op is about.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

I'm guessing they are refering to Dragon Ball (Goku). Whose original voice actress (in Japanese) is Masako Nozawa.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 2 years ago

Command has a range of 60 ft. If it was 5 ft. the approach command would be pretty useless.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

It depends. You might say something like "I've got a meeting from 12 to 14", which is perfectly natural. But also a lot of the time you might just say "I go to bed at 9" because the context makes it obvious that you mean 9 in the evening. Most people don't go to bed in the morning. Unless you do, but then you would probably give context "I'm going to bed at 9 in the morning, because I work nights", for example.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

This doesn't really work as far as I can tell, RAW or RAI. While it is the case that in theory a Melee Attack with a Heavy Ranged Weapon would satisfy both criteria, there is no weapon that can normally perform such an attack, as far as I'm aware. Using a Heavy Crossbow or a Longbow to make a Melee Attack would be attacking with an Improvised Melee Weapon, which is both not a Ranged Weapon and does not have the Heavy property, so neither Feat would be useful.

If we are being generous we could say that attacking with a Heavy Crossbow would be like a Club and a Longbow would be like a Staff, and per the Improvised Weapons rules we could use those weapon stats for our Improvised Weapon, however, note that neither of these have the Heavy property, so you would be unable to use either Feat in this case as well. (The Heavy property, particularly on Ranged Weapons, seems to be not about the weight of the weapon (an intrinsic property of the thing), but about the strength required to attack with such a weapon in it's intended manner. In this way it would make sense that neither Feat would work.)

view more: next ›

Nikko882

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago