Maho

I was thinking about manually editing every comment to replace them with lorem ipsums and similar rubbish text, I wonder if they would mark that as "suspicious activity" and lock me out of my account? I read some people in the past had similar issues with mass deletions or edits.

My first one was Star Trek TNG: Advanced Holodeck Tutorial for Game Gear. I wasn't really a trekkie back then (had watched a few of the TOS movies with my dad and liked them but didn't really care much about Star Trek until around the 30th anniversary I think). I remember thinking the game's enterprise design was dumb and wanted the stylized one from the movies back (and Kirk and Spock and Scotty instead of these "random stand-ins" :P)

And I think my favorite one was a heavily modded Bridge Commander. I didn't really play much of the actual game (or "the campaign" as kids call it today) but spent probably around 100 hours playing custom scenarios, battles from the movies and shows.

So are we expected to just avoid using any software that loads pictures for a month...or forever in the case of models with no more support?

That reminded me a bit of that time I was spending the summer at grandparent's and went to the gas station to buy a few things I needed, and saw a magazine special dedicated to a tv show that was really popular with girls at that time, including a dvd and 3d anaglyph glasses. Picked it too.

Cute early 20s girl in the counter: "ohhh, do you like this show?? :D" Me: "no, I'm just buying it for the 3D glasses for using them with Minecraft" girl: "oh okay :/"

me, almost a week later, playing Minecraft at 3 or 4 AM: "wait, was that flirty?"

$8chan.

I don't remember Tasha being more subpar than the rest of the cast, the first two seasons were abysmal compared to seasons 3+.

Some time ago I was so sick of reading complaints about the "nu-trek wokeism" I started a rewatch of the different shows making a list of the obviously woke things touched in every episode to make a long thread, episode by episode... I abandoned the idea because watching it "just to prove a point" wasn't enjoyable, and it felt dumb having to explain why this or that is progressive.

Some episodes haven't aged well, and Star Trek has lagged in some issues (lgtb specially) but they were really progressive for the time they were aired. The anti racism for example was constant an pretty on the nose. Every mention of capitalism in TNG being treated as a dumb teenager phase in humankind story...

I don't get how you can watch that, and consider yourself a fan, and ignore all of that.

Insurrection is not among my faves but for me it's exactly what a Star Trek movie should be: a two parter episode with better budget.

Seriously? their attack against an asshole transphobe is... calling her tr*nny and being exactly as shitty as her?

Bashir and chief O'Brien have also a deep friendship and no one has ever claimed they were in a romantic relationship. Or Picard and Riker. Or Geordi and Data. They have close and meaningful friendships and no one else sees more than that. Sure, there are fanfics, but it's not something really accepted as fact by many in the fandom, as opposed to Bashir and Garak. The dynamics between Bashir and Garak really feel like flirting, specially in the first one or two seasons. And nothing really makes me think Andy Robinson is lying when he says he really intended to portray Garak like that.

There are also pretty decent writings explaining why the relationship between Frodo and Sam reads as homosexual, like this one. I mean, even when I read the book around a decade before the movies were released, I remember talking about it on IRC and people who had read it earlier were making constant jokes about how gay frodo and sam are. Even people who refuse to have queer content in their fiction saw them as queer.

Can't talk about Captain America and Bucky because I know very little of the source material and didn't enjoy these movies enough to care about any character and considered they made little sense, even heterosexual romance is pretty badly done in the MCU in my opinion.

Btw, the same thing you are complaining about could be said about male-female relationships, whenever there is a close friendship between a male and a female characters, a relationship is expected, and sometimes even forced between characters who had none in the source material when adapting it (The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy or the Hobbit for example). And we have tons of examples of forced heterosexual romances with far less chemistry than Bashir and Garak that harm their respective movies and shows (don't get me started on Rey/Kylo Ren, Padme/Anakin, or Spock/Uhura in the Abrams movies, or the dumpster fire that is Passengers).

Complaining about a bunch of people just being happy with the few crumbles of non harmful queer subtext we could have in the 90s feels a bit petty.

Is it ever stated that Kirk is "heterosexual" in the show? I mean, i'm trying hard to find a "heterosexual" explanation to Kirk's reaction here https://youtu.be/Fw11Ak0mxyI

her acting was terrible.

It's not like the rest of the cast were stellar (yet). The first season was pretty bad in general, I don't see her being that much worse.