Unpopular opinion but I support the intent of this bill. Kids shouldn't be exposed to algorithmic content. As it's currently written it looks to be limited to platforms with a certain threshold of users. Which might actually encourage fediverse growth. Any slippery slop argument is silly and just benefits Zuck and friends.
With the rowers bumping in to each other with each stroke
Life bites lazy people in the arse. They will have some short term wins but plateau. But honestly, if they're just there for the piece of paper then I think you're going to struggle to change their minds. Why do you want to convince them to change? And what is your school doing to curb brain rot AI usage?
I do this for my 4yo
Maybe you have a small package
Use isolated browser instances instead. I want to be able to install useful addons for YouTube without having to worry if they're monitoring me when I'm online banking etc. All modern browsers offer this. And I use a mix of browsers for different tasks. Like Firefox for most things because of the ad blocking / privacy. But I still use chrome for compatibility as some websites are lazy.
Apparently they've made a come back
I opened Lemmy today and my front page was half TIL posts from Don_Dickle about genitalia
I'm very sheltered
Google has become an awful company. I'm in the process of degoogling but it's not easy given all the monopolies they have created
I'm a Demodex folliculorum and I'm currently dating a Demodex brevis so I'm somewhat of an expert. Our host is pretty gross and rarely showers which has made the real estate in this area really expensive. We've been trying to move to another host but the opportunity hasn't come up yet. Anyway, to answer your question, we have scuba gear.
That would be a good option if the social networks didn't have a long history of acting in bad faith. I think it would be an up hill battle. This seems like a reasonable response