muss n Nachtzug dahin geben wo man hin will, Züge mit Schlafabteil brauchen ne Reservierung, die auch ein bisschen Geld kostet, und haben nur ein begrenztes Kontingent für Interrailreisende und die meisten Interrailtickets haben nur eine gewisse Anzahl an Reisetagen.
ist also keine Option für jede Nacht.
Jo, übernachtungen gehen gut ins Geld, da kann es sich schnell lohnen was günstigeres ausserhalb der größeren Städte zu suchen und ein oder zwei Reisetage zu investieren um sich das eigentliche Ziel anzugucken.
In Juhendherbergen in tourstischen Städten findet man allerdings schnell Leute, mit denen man gemeinsam Zeug tun kann.
Interrail ist toll, hab mir damit vor ein paar Jahren die Niederlande, Belgien und ein bisschen Frankreich angesehen, wenn man vorhat mehrere Städte über zwei drei wochen zu besuchen gibt's nix besseres.
most flexible api-testing-tool
i've tested postman, bruno, insomnia and countless things i forgot, but in the end i'll end up with some bash scripts and curl.
hey, the 24 hours i invested were totally worth it to save 30 minutes of work over a year!
I did with most of them, but they still made me scratch my head a bit, simply because they don't quite fit into my mental model of "game master" or in the case of "narrative vs rules heavy" because i am not sure what kind of games are what and ultimately if those things are mutual exclusive to begin with.
questions i had trouble with because of build in assumptions
Do you prefer to plan and track events going on in the background, or improvise them?
i utilize a lot of random tables in prep and at the table, so i guess improvising? but on the other hand i keep track of things that were the result of random stuff.
Do you prefer rules heavy or narrative heavy systems?
systems like shadowdark, black hack and its off-shoots are rules lite, but are they narrative heavy?
Who does the worldbuilding in your setting?
i plant seeds and do a bit of initial landscaping how they grow is determined during play, but those first sessions are what sets the tone.
Do you integrate players' backstories into the plot?
My players don't come up with intricate backstories, but earlier adventures might have consequences later and characters created after a first characters died often get some in-world knowledge, because they are not a random farmhand setting first out to be an adventurer.
How much setting information do you share with your players out of character?
i often only have broad strokes, before it comes up at the table and if it comes up it's often a players idea that becomes "canon". I am discovering this world almost as much as my players.
Who is responsible for immersion?
everyone at the table, i am not a story dispenser. my role might be called Game Master, but i am as much Player of the Game as the Players of their Characters are. We are doing this together, none of us is offering a service.
Do you spend more time prepping lore and clues, or events and encounters?
i don't see how those things are opposed to another. An armed Caravan of Drows is Lore and Encounter, the idea might have started as one or the other, but at the very least after the session is over it will be both.
How much do you enjoy PC death?
Sometimes that becomes a great story, which i enjoy, sometimes it just happens, which i don't feel much about and sometimes it happens because I did not communicate danger well enough or players interpreted a situation way different than i did, and we only realized after the fact, which feels bad. It's nothing i have a general opinion about.
ist die anzeige von Anubis, dem verwendeten Bot-Blocker und kein Maskottchen von feddit oder so
golfballs come with different amount of "dents" those fuckers are not normed outside of their minimum weight and diameter, and evey kind of ball has to be tested to be allowed for tournament golf.
those dents might not be spread evenly across the ball to get specific flight behaviour and thus this wont be a fair die in most cases.
help me, i never swung a golf club in my life why do i know shit about golf ball!
if iam sitting like this iam not listening, because i am to busy trying to keep sitting like this.
give me atleast a deck of cards to shuffle and allow me to look around.
I've seen enough programmers blindly copypasting code from stackoverflow and other forums without thinking and never understanding the thing they just "wrote", to know that tools like copilot won't make programmers worse, they will allow more people to be bad programmers.
people need to read more code, play around with it, break it and fix it to become better programmers.
might also be sleep apnea.