[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago

'50+' works as a name.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago

These things will earn you a pittance, far, far below minimum wage. It's not worth it if you want to make money. If you have time to play games for many hours in the hope of getting money from it, you'd be much better served with a part-time job.

Literally anything (dog walking, car washing, gardening, cleaning) will earn you 50 fold what you'd get from these scam apps.

They tend to lead you along with winnings and then stagnate when you're close to the minimum payout. You won't actually play that many games; the majority of the time you'll be watching ads.

Avoid like the plague.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago

In your car, house, whatever, that's fine. If you're the kind of person who does it on the street or public transport, you're a twat.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago

No. Just needs a good shot from a competent person, not a fuckwit.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago

Cryptozoology. There are definitely creatures unknown to science. Dozens of new ones are discovered every day. Loch Ness monster - no. Unknown ape - possibly.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 4 months ago

I never have breakfast. The Kelloggs company lied when they said it's the most important meal of the day.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago

To not mince my words: fuck those fucking fuckers.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago

The word skeleton comes from the Ancient Greek word skeletós, which means "dried up".

[-] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Those were certainly all words.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago

I self published two books and am almost ready to do a third. No interest in being a famous author or making millions, just glad to get them out of my head and to know they are just what I intended them to be.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

As a moth aficionado, I'd say they're much more interesting. They evolved 90 million years before butterflies. There are also 9 times as many moth species as butterfly species. They're also more efficient at pollination than not only butterflies but bees. Go moths!

[-] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago

Attenborough, I'd wager. That's about the only one I'd be confident of. Probably Brian Blessed as well.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Diddlydee

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 11 months ago