top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 270 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Based on that logic, ammunition and arms manufacturers should be held liable for damages as well.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The US has a law to limit the liability of gun manufacturers.

    The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a U.S law, passed in 2005, that protects firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products. Both arms manufacturers and dealers can still be held liable for damages resulting from defective products, breach of contract, criminal misconduct, and other actions for which they are directly responsible. However, they may be held liable for negligent entrustment if it is found that they had reason to believe a firearm was intended for use in a crime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 223 points 1 year ago (27 children)

    I'm not a judge, but isn't internet essentially a utility these days? Cutting someone off because of piracy seems like cutting off electricity or water because they did something illegal with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 93 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I'm pretty sure this supreme court would rule that people don't have a right to electricity, or even water. They'll probably be totally ok with people losing internet access as punishment for crossing media owners.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago

    Pragmatically, yes. Legally, no. Progressives have been fighting for years to get internet classified as a utility in the US, and regressives and (ironically) internet companies have been fighting against that effort at every turn in the name of profit.

    And now look how well that's turned out. Gee, if only some people had warned them that deregulation was a monkey's paw...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 154 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

    If it's upheld, that's the precursor to full-blown info blackouts, just cut off internet to anyone 'accused' of wrongspeak against the powers that be, which is basically everyone.

    This also sounds like SOPA reborn.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 109 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Being accused of will lose you access to basic infrastructure? Why not cut electricity too?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 108 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm not doing piracy, I am merely training my AI!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 102 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Accused???

    Well alrighty then, I hereby accuse the operators of donaldjtrump.com of piracy! Anybody else notice any piratical activity? Foxnews.com seems pretty fishy.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 83 points 1 year ago

    I nominate we test with out with the Zuck and his networks.

  • source
  • [–] 82 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This still won’t make me pay for Netflix

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 76 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    So if Meta is convicted of pirating books for AI training, they lose all internet connectivity? 🧐

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 69 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    "the internet" is a necessity and requirement to function in society. You can't be denied access to it anymore, it would be disproportionate.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 60 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    This is how you get a new darknet.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 56 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    And now I'm on a VPN because if they're just gonna cut people off for accusing of piracy they're gonna have to cut off everyone with a VPN.

    TBH I should have been behind a VPN before

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Pirate everything, death to the capitalists.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Get to the point that you don't want their products. Consuming their stuff at all is like sporting brand name cloths and covering the logo.

    Once you do this you will find you don't need most of it and it's just a waste of time anyway. The stuff that is authentic and that you genuinely need you can support.

    It's honestly like quitting drugs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    The mere accusation causing someone to lose the Internet, which is vital to modern life, would be insane.

    Additionally, it would do little to nothing to stop piracy.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago

    All public wifi will be disconnected pretty quickly.

  • source
  • [+] 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)

    The unproven claims is the key part here. Also the point of "terminating an account would punish every user in a household" is important as well.

    You can fine someone for piracy if you want. As long as they have the standard legal protections. But cutting access is excessive.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In the beginning we used to exchange cassettes. You would have a boombox with two cassettes. You would play one while you recorded on the other. Then you gave the cassette back to your friend. Next was the VCR with the big ass cassettes.

    Then you would do the same with floppies, then zip disks. Then one day CD recording was a thing, then DVDs. Then thumb drives and now portable HDDs. Basically the cheapest form or recording is always the most popular way for people to share stuff.

    The only ones who don't want us to share are those who want to make millions by never innovating.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 1 year ago

    let's all fall on our sword to make sure Disney never loses a potential subscriber for Marvel Wars. Truly, we are defending the interests of the people here

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago

    Then pirates will just get smarter. No way for them to see who is watching all of these movies with their VPN and Debrid service.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    (Donald trump voice) "We should hold all food companys liable for users violent crimes, this man stabbed another man to death with a spoon! 30 minutes before he ate kraft mac and cheese. It gave him the energy to violently stab this innocent man"

    Lets hope they got common sense

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 29 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    lol, they'll have no customers! ISPs used to send 'warning' letters to customers in England but that's all.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Lol.

    Do ISPs like making money?

    Then they shouldn't disconnect users who pirate.

    I get notifications from my ISP all the time. They don't do anything though because they like the money I give them.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What will they do when entire College campuses lose internet access because half their students are pirating text books

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›