Buttermilk

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yellowstone

Well....

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

The Left

Oh, sweetheart...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Yeah that is generally the conclusion folks come to when they see the flaws of the system they live in, while also knowing very little of communism.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

He predicts Harris will win citing 8 keys he uses:

 No primary contest and the party is largely behind her

 No sizable third party spoil

 In the short term and long term economies are good

 Biden made large policy changes like Paris accords, chips act, inflation reduction act

 No sustained social unrest

 No meaningful white house scandals

 Challenger charisma is limited to a narrow base

The points against her are:

 Midterm gains by challengers

 Harris isn't the incumbent

With Foreign policy failures and Foreign policy success left unchecked because she passed the majority of the keys.

With those last two he says "The Biden administration is deeply invested in the war in Gaza. Which is a humanitarian disaster, with no end in sight"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are there a lot of false positives, or was he trying to get banned to prove a point? Still false positives are definitely the worry. Maybe it watches for a set number of perfectly timed inputs that otherwise humans wouldn't do.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Certainly seems like change in the attitude and maybe a change in actions, but listening to more of the speech it doesn't sound quite as radical as these two little snippets might suggest.

Still, it's hard to be worse than Biden on Palestine, and this signals maybe her administration will give a least slightly less than full impunity to Netanyahu.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Seems like you just have an axe to grind about fat people. Protein is not the deciding factor in weight gain, calories are, so I don't know why you think a link to the wiki page about obesity would be convincing that protein powder is snake oil.

Even when you coincide that it is relevant you dismiss with little justification. Also BMI is not a great metric for individuals, many that have a lot of muscle are measured as overweight because there is a lot more to bodies that height and mass.

Can you justify why protein powder is snake oil in line with the other things in the thread? I will grant that most people have more than enough protein in a regular diet, but stats about obesity says literally nothing about if powder can help your workouts give the results you're hoping for.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Listen Jack, the schools need riot police to ensure the safety of their lawns.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

No because every gay person I've met is infinitely cooler than any 4channer.

[–] [email protected] 261 points 7 months ago (31 children)

It is interesting how the fakest of things can offer such insight into their creator. This nothing of a human is so desperate for validation about the wasted hours they have spent editing a poorly drawn frog for the uncaring half laugh of strangers, that they invented a scenario where someone could show any interest. So detached from the world they can't imagine anyone that would care enough to talk to them, so they project interest onto the therapist they pay to speak with.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"newsworthy"??

Who said news? The mailing list is my k-drama

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Yeah FreeTube and NewPipe both work for me still. Might be a problem in the future, but I'm hoping I dodge by being in the weird nerd slice that isn't worth trying to force ads to.

view more: next ›