[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Embrace the paradox, humans are arguably the greatest rights violators in all forms of violence, but they are also the only beings capable of granting rights through moral agency. The paradox is also true of anthropocentric climate change, it's creator, but also it's only possible resolver. The environment only has instrumental value to conscious beings so it would miss the mark to assume the absence of humans is in anyone's (including animals) best interest.

Guess we should just try to get through each others thick skulls instead of being edgy :/

[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago

For the love of God eat fiber and drink water. How hard is this?

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Quieter, less point's of failure, and in many cases taking up less space. I have compressed air for dust. In the consumer sphere and almost any enthusiast sphere, air cooling > > > water cooling

1
Only two things scare me (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

Well homie I appreciate the bullet bite but I don't know how to fix you - you not only feel no need to endorse the ending of genocide - even for the marginalized in societies outside your own, you actively discourage and look down upon interfering with genocide. I don't know if you have the capacity to engage as a member of society, and frankly you may be a danger to it. Maybe you get the boot out of Athens ๐Ÿ˜ตโ€๐Ÿ’ซ

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Foundationally we already disagree, as I'm a moral objectivist. To assert moral subjectivity is to assert that moral progress does not exist. But with your edit your argument is actually now even worse IMO, because instead of focusing on a moral relativist position you're now basically saying morality=culture/law. i.e., since you have no say in what another society does without disrupting their agreed practice, all their actions are permissible. Bigotry is permissible. Slavery is permissible, hangings are permissible, genocide is permissible, etc, just so long as it simultaneously does not occur within proximity to you and rejects your preference. I think you are tolerant of intolerance.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago

The people who want me to stop punching nonconsenting people in the face unprovoked sure are smug about not punching nonconsenting people in the face unprovoked. They should stop telling me what to do. Live and let live. I am very intelligent. An enlightened centrist you might say! โ˜๏ธ๐Ÿค“

[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago

Imagine caring at all

[-] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago

Um sweaty dry beans are shelf stable for five years โ˜๏ธ๐Ÿค“

[-] [email protected] 33 points 2 years ago

Part of me is okay with this not because I don't want green initiatives, but because it would be wasted on a state that will need a large population exodus. If we are thinking about climate change long term, we should not be encouraging people to be in or stay in Florida. Build the infrastructure elsewhere.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

People should respond as if it is fixable, even if it is not. Any mitigation or reduction is positive. If you're gonna go out, go out swinging. Reject the status quo. Expect more from yourself and others.

And also go Vegan ๐Ÿค—

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Make your dreams come true! There are dozens of us Vegan couples! Dozens! The pool is small but someome tipping their toes in is ready to drag you under and not let go O_O

view more: next โ€บ

BonfireOvDreams

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago