So the only people who have say over the life of a child is the parents. Children have no personal rights against domestic abuse including neglect. In this specific example, neglecting their development.

The nation has a responsibility to make sure that neglect by the parents does not mean abuse to the child. That's why the ultimate solution for neglect is foster care. In the same sense, the state can encourage involvement by parents, but can't rely on it. Orphans exist, and more directly, abusive or neglectful parents exist.

And how do you get parents to universally improve over time? You can't drive the improvement without a top down incentive at bare minimum. If no child left behind failed, look at why and try again, don't give up and say the nation will be illiterate outside of the ruling class.

I mean they're exclusively writing tools for power users for eventual implementation to mainline as they develop and test simplification that doesn't alienate the power user.... So managers can't really say they're doing anything bad or dumb ever because it's power user features then porting.

I was a long distance runner, qualified to go to state finals even. I can never run safely in my life though, because I tore a tendon in a cross country race, and even though it's been repaired surgically if I try again it will tear again.

There are only a few safe types of shoes I can wear to reduce injury risk, one of those being a Nike shoe. Walkers tolerated as a sign always stings.

I even remember in econ101 my professor brought up the basic analysis, then brought up a really cool example of this where the minimum wage changed in one state but not another in two towns right on the border. It was the perfect econ experiment to prove how supply and demand would cause inflation.

The next 5 years saw no change despite a 2 dollar an hour increase on one side only - the two towns maintained equal pricing, and no increase to inflation or pricing compared to the typical rate.

My favorite part was that he managed to be excited about it properly, because it was and is cool science to him when usually economics is trying to analyze how changes happened with way too many variables.

In Wikipedias case, you just fail to make an edit/new post. So you can verify if Ai can make a usable post up to standard with people who can verify but not make, hopefully saving enough time and bulk to help that group learn to make properly, as well as leave the ones Ai will fuck up to people who can do it right.

I mean, kind of? There are system traces of what the squirrels ate that build up, causing weird issues with other software over time. It's why restarting your computer fixes so many software errors. Part of the close process of the computer is cleaning up most of the squirrel poops.