this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
456 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For those that don't know, Firefox has in-built support for automatically rejecting cookies and blocking the cookie banners from popping up.

To enable this feature, go to about:config, and perform the following:

  • change cookiebanners.service.mode from 0 to 2

To have this functionality in Private browsing mode, you should also:

  • change cookiebanners.service.mode.privateBrowsing from 0 to 2.

All Power to the People!

edit: (credit for this information goes to this lemming). Apparently, mode 2 means reject all or fall back to accept all if there is no Reject All button. Mode 1 only hits a Reject All button if available but ignores others.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Careful, mode 2 means reject all or fall back to accept all if there is no Reject All button. So use that only if cookies are disabled or otherwise controlled, for example by an AddOn like Cookie AutoDelete. If not, rather use mode 1 that hits only a Reject All button if available but ignores others.

See https://community.mozilla.org/de/campaigns/firefox-cookie-banner-handling/ and https://github.com/mozilla/cookie-banner-rules-list

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh boy this is great for privacy but it’s also going to break a lot of academic shit that relies on cookies for authentication

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think this blocks all cookies, but instead disables all non-essential cookies in those cookie consent dialogs

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, firefox achieving feature parity with lynx? :^)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

CLI is king ;-)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

According to Mozilla setting both to the value 1 is the better idea. The fallback then won't be "Accept all".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Does "Reject All" also object to legitimate interest?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

or use Consent-O-Matic to automatically reject all the non-essential cookies https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/consent-o-matic/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s good but nowhere near as good as I-Dont-Like-Cookies was. Shame that guy sold out. Consent-O-Matic still seems to miss a lot of consent screens.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There is a community version called "I still don't care about cookies" https://github.com/OhMyGuus/I-Dont-Care-About-Cookies

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I prefer an "accept all" approach, refusing all of them will lead to a degraded experience

Except abusers like Facebook who go in their dedicated isolated container

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

When mentioning data harvesting leviathans, Facebook is definitely on the list, but Google is the undisputed champ of surveillance capitalism. They’ve just got so many people addicted to their “free” services that most don’t want to mention it. I use Firefox mainly because it’s not Chromium based.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This isn't anything new. Firefox lost the lead ages ago (thanks, Mozilla):

https://brave.com/privacy-updates/21-blocking-cookie-notices/

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a chrome reskin, cryptominer and the CEO's an anti-LGBT fascist. no thanks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The cryptominer part is just FUD. Learn how it works. And the browser itself is way more private then FF by default.

The CEO was one also of the cofounders of Mozilla. How ironic.

Also, the actual CEO of Mozilla is doing a great job... At increasing her paycheck while firing developers:

https://itdm.com/mozilla-firefox-usage-down-85-but-why-are-execs-salary-up-400/2050/

Mozilla is one of the most corrupt orgs out there, right now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mozilla is one of the most corrupt orgs out there, right now.

Really? Compared to google, the banks, etc? You say they're one of the worst?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

dude's a Brave shill. ignore, block and move on.