title (cw drugs) (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
 

all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 32 points 2 years ago

CW this for white person please

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago

    CW this for Reddit stuff pls

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago

    CW this for religion stuff pls

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    The dudes who wrote this shit were high off their gourd on shrooms so it tracks.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I got curious and looked into it a bit, it was pobably not actually shrooms. It was more likely ergot, rhododendron honey, or hallucinogenic bream. These seem to be the hallucinogenics of choice in Greece, Anatolia, and the Levant during the first and second centuries CE. I didn't even know you could get high from just eating a fish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There’s a sub called meth without communism and I don’t know why lol

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    Ah I remember learning about the meth and supposed meth commies forever ago, I never learned what caused the split between the two meth factions but the idea of a minor meth civil war kills me. Both subs are a lil unhinged but a fun trip to visit if you ever needed verification that you ain't that fucked up.

    Now don't mind me, gonna take a vid of me smokin a 1g crystal with trance in the background for internet points

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    average german peasant going through proletarianization in the 16th century

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    CW this for drug stuff pls

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    can't tell if you're joking. afaik there's no rule for that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I mean we have some frequent users that are trying to quit, so my mind just went to them. I'm not gonna lock or delete a post over it, just thought it would be considerate edgeworth-shrug

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    ok i added it

    but i rolled my eyes while doing it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I'm probably just being weird but thank you!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'd say that is a good call and should be a rule. In retrospect I should have done so when posting text about it too etc. There's the recovery angle and it can be uncomfortable to hear about if you've had parents or close relations that were or are addicts. There's a lot of reasons people might not wanna see or hear about drug stuff, I think it'd be good policy and await the struggle session

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    And I say this as someone who has only like...soft quit hard drugs. I no longer buy them on my own but will toss in on a couple rocks at a part or whatever. I'm coming from it as a guy who has done all the drugs and has some issues with some and know a lot of people with issues with others or people that have had really bad childhoods cause drugs etc. I'd include alcohol as well if not especially because it's already freely advertised so if you're trying yo get off the sauce there's just that much more imagery. Obviously discussions of it shouldn't be banned but I do think it would even make sense for people posting about being drunk etc to require a CW.

    I'm not computer guy but if there was a way to automate a CW when certain keywords are posted I think it would really help as well. I'd hate to give up people drunk posting and telling you about it and I understand forgetting to CW when intoxicated/being a bit mad to have to edit after as well. Images and stuff would still require someone asking but for text it would save a lot of work/conflict

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    average reddit-logo user.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Imagine the smell

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Doesn't everything though?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    The "Galloping Gospel" becomes even more galloping.

  • source