top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 186 points 2 years ago (23 children)

Larian Studios does technically have a single shareholder in Tencent—which owns around 30% of the company. However, an important piece of context is that Tencent appears to own what's called a "preference" share, meaning that Tencent doesn't have voting rights when it comes to Larian's decision making. The rest of the company belongs to CEO and Founder Swen Vincke and his wife.

Interesting, did not know that.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    This is great but my fear is that one day he will go public and not share the profits with the employees. I worked at a company like that. Said they would never sell until they did for a record amount that they didn't really share with the employees.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (21 replies)
    [–] 67 points 2 years ago (17 children)

    You know, they got a point. You gotta believe in the project, and when you do it properly, you will make the money back, and much more.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    Okay, but where's that money coming from? Someone has to upfront pay for things. Larian are lucky, they have a majory investor that was not looking for any control, they released in early access and had runway money from previous projects to go with. They are the exception, not the rule, unfortunately.

    Publishers no longer publish third parties for the most part, so everyone who isn't a subsidiary of a large company has to find funding somewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    From me for example. I follow this studio and team since many years and i've participated to the funding of Divinity: Original Sin (DOS) more than a decade ago...

    They got money from several sources but mainly because (or i should say thanks to) they delivered good products, they have being able to survive and work on BG3. Luck is not the reason, they've worked hard to achieve that...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    You want tell me that to run a good business, one has to be able to negotiate preferable terms with investors?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    If the implication is that they should be negotiating better terms. Well, good luck with that. I've been a part of many teams involved with investor negotiations. You need their money a hell of a lot more than they need your teams risk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I don't say it's easy. But if you want to make a good creative product you have to be able to keep the creative control, that is part of your job and what makes realization of creative ideas, especially on big scale, more difficult. It's the same with other creative media like movies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Building games that are actually fun is going to make you the most money, that's it.

    Say it louder for the publishers in the back.

    It's infuriating how game design is devolving into engagement treadmills instead of simply being fun, concise experiences. The industry needs more Hi-Fi Rushes and less Suicide Squads.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    I don't really enjoy their games, but I love them as a studio

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago

    The problem is publishers and the huge risk you're selling to create a hit. You still have shareholders. Those who take the risk in financing a game development and those who own the IP.

    Unless you got extremely lucky and can gamble with your own cash you always have shareholders in game development.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›